Literature DB >> 1607571

Telephone surveys as a method for obtaining dietary information: a review.

T A Fox1, J Heimendinger, G Block.   

Abstract

The use of telephone surveys has increased significantly in the past decade. One advantage of telephone surveys is the ability to reach a large number of individuals: 97% of the US population owns telephones. Another advantage is cost savings: telephone surveys cost as little as one quarter to one half the amount of face-to-face surveys. Computer-assisted telephone interviewing has improved data collection, coding, and analysis. Random-digit dialing and a number of statistical advances such as weighting and stratification have significantly enhanced sample selection and research design of telephone surveys. The increasing need to collect dietary information from populations in an affordable fashion has expanded the use of telephone dietary surveys. To date, telephone dietary surveys have been used for follow-up after initial face-to-face contact has been made. The most common dietary instruments used are the 24-hour recall and the food frequency questionnaire. This review indicates that well-designed and well-administered telephone surveys are as good as, and may be better than, other methods for obtaining dietary information.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1607571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  9 in total

1.  Estimating the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms: a comparison of telephone survey and household survey results.

Authors:  M R Douglas; S Mallonee; G R Istre
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Bias in protein and potassium intake collected with 24-h recalls (EPIC-Soft) is rather comparable across European populations.

Authors:  Sandra P Crispim; Anouk Geelen; Jeanne H M de Vries; Heinz Freisling; Olga W Souverein; Paul J M Hulshof; Marga C Ocke; Hendriek Boshuizen; Lene F Andersen; Jiri Ruprich; Willem De Keyzer; Willem De Keizer; Inge Huybrechts; Lionel Lafay; Maria S de Magistris; Fulvio Ricceri; Rosario Tumino; Vittorio Krogh; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Joline W J Beulens; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Androniki Naska; Francesca L Crowe; Heiner Boeing; Alison McTaggart; Rudolf Kaaks; Pieter Van't Veer; Nadia Slimani
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Digital photography: a new method for estimating food intake in cafeteria settings.

Authors:  D A Williamson; H R Allen; P Davis Martin; A Alfonso; B Gerald; A Hunt
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.652

4.  Effects of high adherence to mediterranean or low-fat diets in medicated secondary prevention patients.

Authors:  Maria Cristina D Thomazella; Marisa F S Góes; Cláudia R Andrade; Victor Debbas; Denise F Barbeiro; Renata L Correia; Sueli K N Marie; Arturo J Cardounel; Protásio L daLuz; Francisco R M Laurindo
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Accuracy of fourth-graders' dietary recalls of school breakfast and school lunch validated with observations: in-person versus telephone interviews.

Authors:  Suzanne Domel Baxter; William O Thompson; Mark S Litaker; Caroline H Guinn; Francesca H A Frye; Michelle L Baglio; Nicole M Shaffer
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.045

6.  Relative validity of the Geisinger Rural Aging Study food frequency questionnaire.

Authors:  D C Mitchell; K L Tucker; J Maras; F R Lawrence; H Smiciklas-Wright; G L Jensen; C D Still; T J Hartman
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.075

7.  Replacing caloric beverages with water or diet beverages for weight loss in adults: main results of the Choose Healthy Options Consciously Everyday (CHOICE) randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Deborah F Tate; Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy; Elizabeth Lyons; June Stevens; Karen Erickson; Kristen Polzien; Molly Diamond; Xiaoshan Wang; Barry Popkin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Relative validity of a web-based food frequency questionnaire for Danish adolescents.

Authors:  Anne A Bjerregaard; Thorhallur I Halldorsson; Freja B Kampmann; Sjurdur F Olsen; Inge Tetens
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Assessing the Validity of the Past-Month, Online Canadian Diet History Questionnaire II Pre and Post Nutrition Intervention.

Authors:  Justine R Horne; Jason Gilliland; Janet Madill
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.