BACKGROUND: The positioning of patients during scoliosis surgery has been shown to affect the scoliosis curve, yet positioning has not been exploited to help improve surgical outcome from a biomechanics point of view. Biomechanical models have been used to study other aspects of scoliosis. The goal of this study is to simulate the specific influence of the prone operative position and anaesthesia using a finite element model with patient personalized material properties. METHODS: A finite element model of the spine, ribcage and pelvis was created from the 3D standing geometry of two patients. To this model various positions were simulated. Initially the left and right supine pre-operative bending were simulated. Using a Box-Benkin experimental design the material properties of the intervertebral disks were personalized so that the bending simulations best matched the bending X-rays. The prone position was then simulated by applying the appropriate boundary conditions and gravity loads and the 3D geometry was compared to the X-rays taken intra-operatively. Finally an anaesthesia factor was added to the model to relax all the soft tissues. FINDINGS: The behaviour of the model improved for all three positions once the material properties were personalized. By incorporating an anaesthesia factor the results of the prone intra-operative simulation better matched the prone intra-operative X-ray. However, the anaesthesia factor was different for both patients. For the prone position simulation with anaesthesia patient 1 corrected from 62 degrees to 47 degrees and 43 degrees to 31 degrees. Patient 2 corrected from 70 degrees to 55 degrees and 40 degrees to 32 degrees for the thoracic and lumbar curves respectively. INTERPRETATION: Positioning of the patient, as well as anaesthesia, provide significant correction of the spinal deformity even before surgical instrumentation is fixed to the vertebra. The biomechanical effect of positioning should be taken into consideration by surgeons and possibly modify the support cushions accordingly to maximise 3D curve correction. The positioning is an important step that should not be overlooked by when simulating surgical correction and biomechanical models could be used to help determine optimal cushion placement.
BACKGROUND: The positioning of patients during scoliosis surgery has been shown to affect the scoliosis curve, yet positioning has not been exploited to help improve surgical outcome from a biomechanics point of view. Biomechanical models have been used to study other aspects of scoliosis. The goal of this study is to simulate the specific influence of the prone operative position and anaesthesia using a finite element model with patient personalized material properties. METHODS: A finite element model of the spine, ribcage and pelvis was created from the 3D standing geometry of two patients. To this model various positions were simulated. Initially the left and right supine pre-operative bending were simulated. Using a Box-Benkin experimental design the material properties of the intervertebral disks were personalized so that the bending simulations best matched the bending X-rays. The prone position was then simulated by applying the appropriate boundary conditions and gravity loads and the 3D geometry was compared to the X-rays taken intra-operatively. Finally an anaesthesia factor was added to the model to relax all the soft tissues. FINDINGS: The behaviour of the model improved for all three positions once the material properties were personalized. By incorporating an anaesthesia factor the results of the prone intra-operative simulation better matched the prone intra-operative X-ray. However, the anaesthesia factor was different for both patients. For the prone position simulation with anaesthesia patient 1 corrected from 62 degrees to 47 degrees and 43 degrees to 31 degrees. Patient 2 corrected from 70 degrees to 55 degrees and 40 degrees to 32 degrees for the thoracic and lumbar curves respectively. INTERPRETATION: Positioning of the patient, as well as anaesthesia, provide significant correction of the spinal deformity even before surgical instrumentation is fixed to the vertebra. The biomechanical effect of positioning should be taken into consideration by surgeons and possibly modify the support cushions accordingly to maximise 3D curve correction. The positioning is an important step that should not be overlooked by when simulating surgical correction and biomechanical models could be used to help determine optimal cushion placement.