Literature DB >> 16059699

Utilization of the embryonated egg for in vivo evaluation of the anti-influenza virus activity of neuraminidase inhibitors.

A Sauerbrei1, A Haertl, A Brandstaedt, M Schmidtke, P Wutzler.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that embryonated egg provides a convenient and easy to use system for in vivo screening of anti-influenza virus inhibitors. However, it is not known whether this model is suitable for testing neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors, too. Therefore, the present study describes the evaluation of the ion-channel blockers amantadine and rimantadine in comparison with the NA inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir by using the influenza A virus hen's egg model. The treatment was started immediately before or after the challenge dose was placed on the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). Differences between the survival rate of treated and untreated chick embryos infected with influenza A virus were analyzed statistically. As result, the survival rate of chick embryos could be significantly increased when the treatment with amantadine, rimantadine, oseltamivir, or zanamivir was started before the CAM was inoculated with one egg infective dose 50% (EID50) influenza A virus. When the drugs were administered shortly after viral inoculation, significant antiviral efficacy was shown for rimantadine, oseltamivir, and zanamivir. Antiviral efficacy could be demonstrated exclusively for both oseltamivir and zanamivir after the embryos were infected with higher challenge doses of 10(2) EID50 influenza A virus. In conclusion, the NA inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir have a significantly better antiviral activity against influenza A virus than amantadine and rimantadine tested in embryonated hen's eggs. Therefore, this model can be a valuable alternative approach for in vivo pre-testing anti-influenza virus activity of NA inhibitors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16059699     DOI: 10.1007/s00430-005-0002-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol        ISSN: 0300-8584            Impact factor:   3.402


  24 in total

Review 1.  Managing influenza: amantadine, rimantadine and beyond.

Authors:  D M Fleming
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Oseltamivir: a review of its use in influenza.

Authors:  K McClellan; C M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Changes in in vitro susceptibility of influenza A H3N2 viruses to a neuraminidase inhibitor drug during evolution in the human host.

Authors:  Catherine I Thompson; Wendy S Barclay; Maria C Zambon
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Inhibition of influenza virus infections in mice by GS4104, an orally effective influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitor.

Authors:  R W Sidwell; J H Huffman; D L Barnard; K W Bailey; M H Wong; A Morrison; T Syndergaard; C U Kim
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.970

5.  Comparison of the anti-influenza virus activity of RWJ-270201 with those of oseltamivir and zanamivir.

Authors:  S Bantia; C D Parker; S L Ananth; L L Horn; K Andries; P Chand; P L Kotian; A Dehghani; Y El-Kattan; T Lin; T L Hutchison; J A Montgomery; D L Kellog; Y S Babu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Zanamivir: a review of its use in influenza.

Authors:  C J Dunn; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  In vitro and in vivo assay systems for study of influenza virus inhibitors.

Authors:  R W Sidwell; D F Smee
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.970

8.  Characterization of virulent and avirulent A/chicken/Pennsylvania/83 influenza A viruses: potential role of defective interfering RNAs in nature.

Authors:  W J Bean; Y Kawaoka; J M Wood; J E Pearson; R G Webster
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Host cell-mediated variation in H3N2 influenza viruses.

Authors:  J M Katz; C W Naeve; R G Webster
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.616

10.  Treatment of influenza infection of mice by using rimantadine hydrochlorides by the aerosol and intraperitoneal routes.

Authors:  E L Stephen; J W Dominik; J B Moe; R O Spertzel; J S Walker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  6 in total

1.  Motion-artifact-free in vivo imaging utilizing narcotized avian embryos in ovo.

Authors:  Alexander Heidrich; Lydia Würbach; Thomas Opfermann; Hans Peter Saluz
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Amantadine and rimantadine for influenza A in children and the elderly.

Authors:  Márcia G Alves Galvão; Marilene Augusta Rocha Crispino Santos; Antonio J L Alves da Cunha
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-21

3.  Combination therapy of zinc and trimethoprim inhibits infection of influenza A virus in chick embryo.

Authors:  Magdi H El Habbal
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.099

4.  Antiviral activity of phenanthrenes from the medicinal plant Bletilla striata against influenza A virus.

Authors:  Ya Shi; Bing Zhang; Yiyu Lu; Chaodong Qian; Yan Feng; Liwei Fang; Zhishan Ding; Dongqing Cheng
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.659

5.  Assessing the susceptibility of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses to oseltamivir using embryonated chicken eggs.

Authors:  Deeksha S Tare; Sadhana S Kode; Aeron C Hurt; Shailesh D Pawar
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Assessment of potency of PC-complexed Ocimum sanctum methanol extract in embryonated eggs against Influenza virus (H1N1).

Authors:  Priyanka Jadhav; Hingorani Lal; Nilima Kshirsagar
Journal:  Pharmacogn Mag       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.085

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.