Literature DB >> 16056005

The evolving use of cost-effectiveness analysis in formulary management within the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Sherrie L Aspinall1, Chester B Good, Peter A Glassman, Michael A Valentino.   

Abstract

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) runs the largest integrated healthcare system in the nation. Formulary management within VHA primarily involves 3 national groups: the Medical Advisory Panel, the Veterans Integrated Service Network Formulary Leaders, and the Pharmacy Benefits Management Strategic Healthcare Group. Together, these groups manage the VHA national drug formulary with a goal of providing a comprehensive, safe, and cost-effective pharmacy benefit for veterans. Traditionally, VHA has relied on cost-minimization analyses in formulary decisions. More recently, VHA has emphasized the use of cost-effectiveness data, especially for newer, costly drugs. In addition to including this data in drug monographs, the VHA has begun requiring formal cost-effectiveness analysis from manufacturers of selected pharmaceuticals. VHA has also requested that clinically relevant information such as quality of life plus mortality benefit be made available from industry so that internal cost analyses can be performed. It is hoped that by setting the expectation that cost-effectiveness will be formally considered in all VHA formulary decisions, the pharmaceutical industry and others will be stimulated to collect and report data that enables these analyses. We believe that if other organizations also place an emphasis on economic evaluations, industry and the public will be more accepting of decisions that incorporate cost considerations.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16056005     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000170004.17480.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  9 in total

Review 1.  How should we use age to ration health care? Lessons from the case of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Arthur L Caplan; Roy D Bloom; Peter L Abt; Jason H Karlawish
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Novel approaches to incorporating pharmacoeconomic studies into phase III clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  H Fillit; J Cummings; P Neumann; T McLaughlin; P Salavtore; C Leibman
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Measuring preferences for cost-utility analysis: how choice of method may influence decision-making.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Reinventing the pharmacy and therapeutics committee.

Authors:  David Shulkin
Journal:  P T       Date:  2012-11

5.  A 3-dimensional view of access to licensed and subsidized medicines under single-payer systems in the US, the UK, Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Rajan Ragupathy; Katri Aaltonen; June Tordoff; Pauline Norris; David Reith
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Decision Analysis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Hilary F Ryder; Christine McDonough; Anna N A Tosteson; Jon D Lurie
Journal:  Semin Spine Surg       Date:  2009-12

7.  Pharmacoeconomic analysis in Saudi Arabia: an overdue agenda item for action.

Authors:  Abdulrazaq S Al-Jazairi; Nada S Al-Qadheeb; Aziza Ajlan
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

8.  Toward a treaty on safety and cost-effectiveness of pharmaceuticals and medical devices: enhancing an endangered global public good.

Authors:  Thomas Alured Faunce
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 4.185

9.  The right drug, but from whose perspective? A framework for analysing the structure and activities of drug and therapeutics committees.

Authors:  Mikael Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.953

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.