Literature DB >> 16055740

Exon inclusion is dependent on predictable exonic splicing enhancers.

Xiang H-F Zhang1, Thaned Kangsamaksin, Mann S P Chao, Joydeep K Banerjee, Lawrence A Chasin.   

Abstract

We have previously formulated a list of approximately 2,000 RNA octamers as putative exonic splicing enhancers (PESEs) based on a statistical comparison of human exonic and nonexonic sequences (X. H. Zhang and L. A. Chasin, Genes Dev. 18:1241-1250, 2004). When inserted into a poorly spliced test exon, all eight tested octamers stimulated splicing, a result consistent with their identification as exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs). Here we present a much more stringent test of the validity of this list of PESEs. Twenty-two naturally occurring examples of nonoverlapping PESEs or PESE clusters were identified in six mammalian exons; five of the six exons tested are constitutively spliced. Each of the 22 individual PESEs or PESE clusters was disrupted by site-directed mutagenesis, usually by a single-base substitution. Eighteen of the 22 disruptions (82%) resulted in decreased splicing efficiency. In contrast, 24 control mutations had little or no effect on splicing. This high rate of success suggests that most PESEs function as ESEs in their natural context. Like most exons, these exons contain several PESEs. Since knocking out any one of several could produce a severalfold decrease in splicing efficiency, we conclude that there is little redundancy among ESEs in an exon and that they must work in concert to optimize splicing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16055740      PMCID: PMC1190244          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.25.16.7323-7332.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  54 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of SR protein specificity.

Authors:  R Tacke; J L Manley
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 8.382

2.  An upstream AG determines whether a downstream AG is selected during catalytic step II of splicing.

Authors:  K Chua; R Reed
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Multiple splicing defects in an intronic false exon.

Authors:  H Sun; L A Chasin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 4.  Pre-mRNA splicing in the new millennium.

Authors:  M L Hastings; A R Krainer
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 5.  Listening to silence and understanding nonsense: exonic mutations that affect splicing.

Authors:  Luca Cartegni; Shern L Chew; Adrian R Krainer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Nonsense-associated altered splicing: a frame-dependent response distinct from nonsense-mediated decay.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Yao Fu Chang; John I Hamilton; Miles F Wilkinson
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Predictive identification of exonic splicing enhancers in human genes.

Authors:  William G Fairbrother; Ru-Fang Yeh; Phillip A Sharp; Christopher B Burge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Comprehensive proteomic analysis of the human spliceosome.

Authors:  Zhaolan Zhou; Lawrence J Licklider; Steven P Gygi; Robin Reed
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Exonic splicing enhancer motif recognized by human SC35 under splicing conditions.

Authors:  H X Liu; S L Chew; L Cartegni; M Q Zhang; A R Krainer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Separable roles for rent1/hUpf1 in altered splicing and decay of nonsense transcripts.

Authors:  Joshua T Mendell; Colette M J ap Rhys; Harry C Dietz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  64 in total

1.  Splicing mutations in glycogen-storage disease type II: evaluation of the full spectrum of mutations and their relation to patients' phenotypes.

Authors:  Stefania Zampieri; Emanuele Buratti; Silvia Dominissini; Anna Lisa Montalvo; Maria Gabriela Pittis; Bruno Bembi; Andrea Dardis
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Identification of RNA-binding proteins that regulate FGFR2 splicing through the use of sensitive and specific dual color fluorescence minigene assays.

Authors:  Emily A Newman; Stephanie J Muh; Ruben H Hovhannisyan; Claude C Warzecha; Richard B Jones; Wallace L McKeehan; Russ P Carstens
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Positive selection acting on splicing motifs reflects compensatory evolution.

Authors:  Shengdong Ke; Xiang H-F Zhang; Lawrence A Chasin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  A nonsense exon in the Tpm1 gene is silenced by hnRNP H and F.

Authors:  Joel L Coles; Martina Hallegger; Christopher W J Smith
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 4.942

5.  Splicing of designer exons reveals unexpected complexity in pre-mRNA splicing.

Authors:  Xiang H-F Zhang; Mauricio A Arias; Shengdong Ke; Lawrence A Chasin
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  Ab initio prediction of mutation-induced cryptic splice-site activation and exon skipping.

Authors:  Petr Divina; Andrea Kvitkovicova; Emanuele Buratti; Igor Vorechovsky
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  In silico to in vivo splicing analysis using splicing code models.

Authors:  Matthew R Gazzara; Jorge Vaquero-Garcia; Kristen W Lynch; Yoseph Barash
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.608

8.  Quantitative evaluation of all hexamers as exonic splicing elements.

Authors:  Shengdong Ke; Shulian Shang; Sergey M Kalachikov; Irina Morozova; Lin Yu; James J Russo; Jingyue Ju; Lawrence A Chasin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Prediction and assessment of splicing alterations: implications for clinical testing.

Authors:  Amanda B Spurdle; Fergus J Couch; Frans B L Hogervorst; Paolo Radice; Olga M Sinilnikova
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  SFmap: a web server for motif analysis and prediction of splicing factor binding sites.

Authors:  Inbal Paz; Martin Akerman; Iris Dror; Idit Kosti; Yael Mandel-Gutfreund
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.