Michael A Moffitt1, Cameron C McIntyre. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Lerner Research Institute, ND-20, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use computational modeling to better understand factors that impact neural recordings with silicon microelectrodes used in brain-machine interfaces. METHODS: A non-linear cable model of a layer V pyramidal cell was coupled with a finite-element electric field model with explicit representation of the microelectrode. The model system enabled analysis of extracellular neural recordings as a function of the electrode contact size, neuron position, edema, and chronic encapsulation. RESULTS: The model predicted spike waveforms and amplitudes that were consistent with experimental recordings. Small (< 1000 microm2) and large (10 k microm2) electrode contacts had similar volumes of recording sensitivity, but small contacts exhibited higher signal amplitudes (approximately 50%) when neurons were in close proximity (50 microm) to the electrode. The model results support the notion that acute edema causes a signal decrease ( approximately 24%), and certain encapsulation conditions can result in a signal increase (approximately 17%), a mechanism that may contribute to signal increases observed experimentally in chronic recordings. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal electrode design is application-dependent. Small and large contact sizes have contrasting recording properties that can be exploited in the design process. In addition, the presence of local electrical inhomogeneities (encapsulation, edema, coatings) around the electrode shank can substantially influence neural recordings and requires further theoretical and experimental investigation. SIGNIFICANCE: Thought-controlled devices using cortical command signals have exciting therapeutic potential for persons with neurological deficit. The results of this study provide the foundation for refining and optimizing microelectrode design for human brain-machine interfaces.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use computational modeling to better understand factors that impact neural recordings with silicon microelectrodes used in brain-machine interfaces. METHODS: A non-linear cable model of a layer V pyramidal cell was coupled with a finite-element electric field model with explicit representation of the microelectrode. The model system enabled analysis of extracellular neural recordings as a function of the electrode contact size, neuron position, edema, and chronic encapsulation. RESULTS: The model predicted spike waveforms and amplitudes that were consistent with experimental recordings. Small (< 1000 microm2) and large (10 k microm2) electrode contacts had similar volumes of recording sensitivity, but small contacts exhibited higher signal amplitudes (approximately 50%) when neurons were in close proximity (50 microm) to the electrode. The model results support the notion that acute edema causes a signal decrease ( approximately 24%), and certain encapsulation conditions can result in a signal increase (approximately 17%), a mechanism that may contribute to signal increases observed experimentally in chronic recordings. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal electrode design is application-dependent. Small and large contact sizes have contrasting recording properties that can be exploited in the design process. In addition, the presence of local electrical inhomogeneities (encapsulation, edema, coatings) around the electrode shank can substantially influence neural recordings and requires further theoretical and experimental investigation. SIGNIFICANCE: Thought-controlled devices using cortical command signals have exciting therapeutic potential for persons with neurological deficit. The results of this study provide the foundation for refining and optimizing microelectrode design for human brain-machine interfaces.
Authors: Romain Brette; Michelle Rudolph; Ted Carnevale; Michael Hines; David Beeman; James M Bower; Markus Diesmann; Abigail Morrison; Philip H Goodman; Frederick C Harris; Milind Zirpe; Thomas Natschläger; Dejan Pecevski; Bard Ermentrout; Mikael Djurfeldt; Anders Lansner; Olivier Rochel; Thierry Vieville; Eilif Muller; Andrew P Davison; Sami El Boustani; Alain Destexhe Journal: J Comput Neurosci Date: 2007-07-12 Impact factor: 1.621
Authors: Zachariah J Sperry; Robert D Graham; Nicholas Peck-Dimit; Scott F Lempka; Tim M Bruns Journal: J Comp Neurol Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 3.215
Authors: Felix Deku; Yarden Cohen; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Aswini Kanneganti; Timothy J Gardner; Stuart F Cogan Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Alexander R Kent; Brandon D Swan; David T Brocker; Dennis A Turner; Robert E Gross; Warren M Grill Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2014-10-05 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: John K Hermann; Madhumitha Ravikumar; Andrew J Shoffstall; Evon S Ereifej; Kyle M Kovach; Jeremy Chang; Arielle Soffer; Chun Wong; Vishnupriya Srivastava; Patrick Smith; Grace Protasiewicz; Jingle Jiang; Stephen M Selkirk; Robert H Miller; Steven Sidik; Nicholas P Ziats; Dawn M Taylor; Jeffrey R Capadona Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.379