Literature DB >> 16055377

Model-based analysis of cortical recording with silicon microelectrodes.

Michael A Moffitt1, Cameron C McIntyre.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use computational modeling to better understand factors that impact neural recordings with silicon microelectrodes used in brain-machine interfaces.
METHODS: A non-linear cable model of a layer V pyramidal cell was coupled with a finite-element electric field model with explicit representation of the microelectrode. The model system enabled analysis of extracellular neural recordings as a function of the electrode contact size, neuron position, edema, and chronic encapsulation.
RESULTS: The model predicted spike waveforms and amplitudes that were consistent with experimental recordings. Small (< 1000 microm2) and large (10 k microm2) electrode contacts had similar volumes of recording sensitivity, but small contacts exhibited higher signal amplitudes (approximately 50%) when neurons were in close proximity (50 microm) to the electrode. The model results support the notion that acute edema causes a signal decrease ( approximately 24%), and certain encapsulation conditions can result in a signal increase (approximately 17%), a mechanism that may contribute to signal increases observed experimentally in chronic recordings.
CONCLUSIONS: Optimal electrode design is application-dependent. Small and large contact sizes have contrasting recording properties that can be exploited in the design process. In addition, the presence of local electrical inhomogeneities (encapsulation, edema, coatings) around the electrode shank can substantially influence neural recordings and requires further theoretical and experimental investigation. SIGNIFICANCE: Thought-controlled devices using cortical command signals have exciting therapeutic potential for persons with neurological deficit. The results of this study provide the foundation for refining and optimizing microelectrode design for human brain-machine interfaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16055377     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  50 in total

1.  Chronically recording with a multi-electrode array device in the auditory cortex of an awake ferret.

Authors:  Heather D Dobbins; Peter Marvit; Yadong Ji; Didier A Depireux
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  Simulation of networks of spiking neurons: a review of tools and strategies.

Authors:  Romain Brette; Michelle Rudolph; Ted Carnevale; Michael Hines; David Beeman; James M Bower; Markus Diesmann; Abigail Morrison; Philip H Goodman; Frederick C Harris; Milind Zirpe; Thomas Natschläger; Dejan Pecevski; Bard Ermentrout; Mikael Djurfeldt; Anders Lansner; Olivier Rochel; Thierry Vieville; Eilif Muller; Andrew P Davison; Sami El Boustani; Alain Destexhe
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Neural origin of evoked potentials during thalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander R Kent; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Estimation of population firing rates and current source densities from laminar electrode recordings.

Authors:  Klas H Pettersen; Espen Hagen; Gaute T Einevoll
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Spatial models of cell distribution in human lumbar dorsal root ganglia.

Authors:  Zachariah J Sperry; Robert D Graham; Nicholas Peck-Dimit; Scott F Lempka; Tim M Bruns
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Amorphous silicon carbide ultramicroelectrode arrays for neural stimulation and recording.

Authors:  Felix Deku; Yarden Cohen; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Aswini Kanneganti; Timothy J Gardner; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Measurement of evoked potentials during thalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander R Kent; Brandon D Swan; David T Brocker; Dennis A Turner; Robert E Gross; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Magnitude and behavior of cross-talk effects in multichannel electrophysiology experiments.

Authors:  Matthew J Nelson; Silvana Valtcheva; Laurent Venance
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Inhibition of the cluster of differentiation 14 innate immunity pathway with IAXO-101 improves chronic microelectrode performance.

Authors:  John K Hermann; Madhumitha Ravikumar; Andrew J Shoffstall; Evon S Ereifej; Kyle M Kovach; Jeremy Chang; Arielle Soffer; Chun Wong; Vishnupriya Srivastava; Patrick Smith; Grace Protasiewicz; Jingle Jiang; Stephen M Selkirk; Robert H Miller; Steven Sidik; Nicholas P Ziats; Dawn M Taylor; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 10.  Improving data quality in neuronal population recordings.

Authors:  Kenneth D Harris; Rodrigo Quian Quiroga; Jeremy Freeman; Spencer L Smith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.