Literature DB >> 28424297

Magnitude and behavior of cross-talk effects in multichannel electrophysiology experiments.

Matthew J Nelson1, Silvana Valtcheva2, Laurent Venance2.   

Abstract

Modern neurophysiological experiments frequently involve multiple channels separated by very small distances. A unique methodological concern for multiple-electrode experiments is that of capacitive coupling (cross-talk) between channels. Yet the nature of the cross-talk recording circuit is not well known in the field, and the extent to which it practically affects neurophysiology experiments has never been fully investigated. Here we describe a simple electrical circuit model of simultaneous recording and stimulation with two or more channels and experimentally verify the model using ex vivo brain slice and in vivo whole-brain preparations. In agreement with the model, we find that cross-talk amplitudes increase nearly linearly with the impedance of a recording electrode and are larger for higher frequencies. We demonstrate cross-talk contamination of action potential waveforms from intracellular to extracellular channels, which is observable in part because of the different orders of magnitude between the channels. This contamination is electrode impedance-dependent and matches predictions from the model. We use recently published parameters to simulate cross-talk in high-density multichannel extracellular recordings. Cross-talk effectively spatially smooths current source density (CSD) estimates in these recordings and induces artefactual phase shifts where underlying voltage gradients occur; however, these effects are modest. We show that the effects of cross-talk are unlikely to affect most conclusions inferred from neurophysiology experiments when both originating and receiving electrode record signals of similar magnitudes. We discuss other types of experiments and analyses that may be susceptible to cross-talk, techniques for detecting and experimentally reducing cross-talk, and implications for high-density probe design.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We develop and experimentally verify an electrical circuit model describing cross-talk that necessarily occurs between two channels. Recorded cross-talk increased with electrode impedance and signal frequency. We recorded cross-talk contamination of spike waveforms from intracellular to extracellular channels. We simulated high-density multichannel extracellular recordings and demonstrate spatial smoothing and phase shifts that cross-talk enacts on CSD measurements. However, when channels record similar-magnitude signals, effects are modest and unlikely to affect most conclusions.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action potential; capacitance; distortion; impedance; methods

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28424297      PMCID: PMC5511876          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00877.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  45 in total

1.  A novel algorithm to remove electrical cross-talk between surface EMG recordings and its application to the measurement of short-term synchronisation in humans.

Authors:  J M Kilner; S N Baker; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  "Cross-talk" in recording evoked potentials.

Authors:  T Nagaoka; D D Walker; P J Seaba; T Yamada
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec

3.  Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons.

Authors:  Costas A Anastassiou; Rodrigo Perin; Henry Markram; Christof Koch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Historical evolution of circuit models for the electrode-electrolyte interface.

Authors:  L A Geddes
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Cell type- and activity-dependent extracellular correlates of intracellular spiking.

Authors:  Costas A Anastassiou; Rodrigo Perin; György Buzsáki; Henry Markram; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Microscale inhomogeneity of brain tissue distorts electrical signal propagation.

Authors:  Matthew J Nelson; Clémentine Bosch; Laurent Venance; Pierre Pouget
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The impedance of stainless-steel electrodes.

Authors:  L A Geddes; C P Da Costa; G Wise
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1971-09

8.  Assessing human brain impedance using simultaneous surface and intracerebral recordings.

Authors:  Radu Ranta; Steven Le Cam; Louise Tyvaert; Valérie Louis-Dorr
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Impedance Spectrum in Cortical Tissue: Implications for Propagation of LFP Signals on the Microscopic Level.

Authors:  Stéphanie Miceli; Torbjørn V Ness; Gaute T Einevoll; Dirk Schubert
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-01-31

10.  Instantaneous modulation of gamma oscillation frequency by balancing excitation with inhibition.

Authors:  Bassam V Atallah; Massimo Scanziani
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  1 in total

1.  Extracellular and intracellular components of the impedance of neural tissue.

Authors:  Claude Bedard; Charlotte Piette; Laurent Venance; Alain Destexhe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.033

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.