Literature DB >> 16055268

Anatomy of the cervical intervertebral foramina: vulnerable arteries and ischemic neurologic injuries after transforaminal epidural injections.

Marc A Huntoon1.   

Abstract

Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections are performed for the treatment of radicular pain. Multiple recent case reports have raised safety concerns regarding neurologic deficits such as anterior spinal artery syndrome and cerebellar injury after these injections. To investigate the potential causes of these injuries, an anatomic study was conducted. In this study of 10 embalmed cadavers, the cervical intervertebral foramina were examined to determine if the ascending or deep cervical arteries supplied radicular or segmental medullary arteries potentially susceptible to cannulation or needle trauma during transforaminal injection. In two specimens, dissection was carried down to the spinal cord, demonstrating the anterior spinal, radicular, and segmental medullary arteries. Of 95 intervertebral foramina dissected, 21 had an arterial vessel proximal to the posterior aspect of the foraminal opening. Seven of these 21 were spinal branches that entered the foramen posteriorly, potentially forming radicular or segmental medullary vessels to the spinal cord. One additional ascending cervical artery formed a segmental medullary artery that joined the anterior spinal artery. This would only be injured by anterior needle misplacement. Of the seven foraminal branches, three were included in the deep dissections. Two contributed to segmental medullary arteries and one to a radicular artery. Variable anastomoses between the vertebral and cervical arteries were found. Therefore, it is possible to introduce steroid particles into the vertebral circulation via the cervical arteries. Critical arteries are located in the posterior aspect of the intervertebral foramen and may be vulnerable to injection or injury during transforaminal epidural steroid injection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16055268     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  33 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Ki Deok Park; Woo Yong Lee; Sang Hyun Nam; Myounghwan Kim; Yongbum Park
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-12-05

2.  Ultrasound-guided versus computed tomography-controlled periradicular injections in the middle and lower cervical spine: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jochen Obernauer; Klaus Galiano; Hannes Gruber; Reto Bale; Alois Albert Obwegeser; Reinhold Schatzer; Alexander Loizides
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Long Term Outcomes from CT-guided Indirect Cervical Nerve Root Blocks and their relationship to the MRI findings--A prospective Study.

Authors:  Susanne Bensler; Reto Sutter; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Cynthia K Peterson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Cervical foraminal steroid injections under CT guidance: retrospective study of in situ contrast aspects in a serial of 248 cases.

Authors:  Pierre Pottecher; Denis Krausé; Lucy Di Marco; Romaric Loffroy; Louis Estivalet; Romain Duhal; Xavier Demondion
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided cervical medial branch block for the treatment of chronic cervical facet joint pain: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Ki Deok Park; Dong-Ju Lim; Woo Yong Lee; JaeKi Ahn; Yongbum Park
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Must we discontinue selective cervical nerve root blocks? Report of two cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Juerg Hodler; Norbert Boos; Martin Schubert
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Injectable corticosteroid preparations: an embolic risk assessment by static and dynamic microscopic analysis.

Authors:  P J MacMahon; M J Shelly; D Scholz; S J Eustace; E C Kavanagh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Cervical radicular pain: the role of interlaminar and transforaminal epidural injections.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Frank J E Falco; Sudhir Diwan; Joshua A Hirsch; Howard S Smith
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-01

9.  Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a randomized, blinded, controlled study.

Authors:  Haemi Jee; Ji Hae Lee; Jongwoo Kim; Ki Deok Park; Woo Yong Lee; Yongbum Park
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Cervical epidural steroid injections for the treatment of cervical spinal (neck) pain.

Authors:  Kenneth D Candido; Nebojsa 'nick' Knezevic
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.