Literature DB >> 16053956

New risk score for patients with acute chest pain, non-ST-segment deviation, and normal troponin concentrations: a comparison with the TIMI risk score.

Juan Sanchis1, Vicent Bodí, Julio Núñez, Vicente Bertomeu-González, Cristina Gómez, María José Bosch, Luciano Consuegra, Xavier Bosch, Francisco J Chorro, Angel Llàcer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to develop a risk score for patients with chest pain, non-ST-segment deviation electrocardiogram (ECG), and normal troponin levels.
BACKGROUND: Prognosis assessment in this population remains a challenge.
METHODS: A total of 646 consecutive patients were evaluated by clinical history (risk factors and chest pain score according to pain characteristics), ECG, and early exercise testing. ST-segment deviation and troponin elevation were exclusion criteria. The primary end point was mortality or myocardial infarction at one year. The secondary end point was mortality, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization at 14 days (similar to the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] risk score).
RESULTS: Primary and secondary end point rates were 6.7% and 5.4%. A risk score was constructed using the variables related to the primary end point: chest pain score > or =10 points (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.5; 1 point), > or =2 pain episodes in last 24 h (HR = 2.2; 1 point), age > or =67 years (HR = 2.3; 1 point), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (HR = 4.2; 2 points), and prior percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (HR = 2.2; 1 point). Patients were classified into five categories of risk (p = 0.0001): 0 points, 0% event rate; 1 point, 3.1%; 2 points, 5.4%; 3 points, 17.6%; > or =4 points, 29.6%. The accuracy of the score was greater than that of the TIMI risk score for the primary (C index of 0.78 vs. 0.66, p = 0.0002) and secondary (C index of 0.70 vs. 0.66, p = 0.1) end points.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with chest pain despite no ST-segment deviation or troponin elevation show a non-negligible rate of events at one year. A risk score derived from this specific population allows more accurate stratification than when using the TIMI risk score.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16053956     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  21 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of the TIMI risk score in patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erik P Hess; Dipti Agarwal; Subhash Chandra; Mohammed H Murad; Patricia J Erwin; Judd E Hollander; Victor M Montori; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  It's tough to make predictions...

Authors:  Wayne Warnica
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Use of multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of acute chest pain: a consensus statement of the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology.

Authors:  Arthur E Stillman; Matthijs Oudkerk; Margaret Ackerman; Christoph R Becker; Pawel E Buszman; Pim J de Feyter; Udo Hoffmann; Matthew T Keadey; Riccardo Marano; Martin J Lipton; Gilbert L Raff; Gautham P Reddy; Michael R Rees; Geoffrey D Rubin; U Joseph Schoepf; Giuseppe Tarulli; Edwin J R van Beek; Lewis Wexler; Charles S White
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: targeted imaging to refine upstream risk stratification.

Authors:  Henry Chang; James K Min; Sunil V Rao; Manesh R Patel; Orlando P Simonetti; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Subha V Raman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Influence of comorbid conditions on one-year outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Juan Sanchis; Julio Núñez; Vicente Bodí; Eduardo Núñez; Ana García-Alvarez; Clara Bonanad; Ander Regueiro; Xavier Bosch; Magda Heras; Joan Sala; Oscar Bielsa; Angel Llácer
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Nomograms for estimating coronary artery disease prognosis with gated stress myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; James K Min; Rory Hachamovitch; Robert C Hendel; Salvador Borges-Neto; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Impact of clinical predictors and routine coronary artery disease testing on outcome of patients admitted to chest pain decision unit.

Authors:  Vlad Cotarlan; David Ho; John Pineda; Anwer Qureshi; Jamshid Shirani
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Comparison of traditional cardiovascular risk models and coronary atherosclerotic plaque as detected by computed tomography for prediction of acute coronary syndrome in patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Maros Ferencik; Christopher L Schlett; Fabian Bamberg; Quynh A Truong; John H Nichols; Antonio J Pena; Michael D Shapiro; Ian S Rogers; Sujith Seneviratne; Blair Alden Parry; Ricardo C Cury; Thomas J Brady; David F Brown; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Limitations of risk score models in patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Alex F Manini; Nina Dannemann; David F Brown; Javed Butler; Fabian Bamberg; John T Nagurney; John H Nichols; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.469

10.  Serum extracellular vesicle protein levels are associated with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Vince C de Hoog; Leo Timmers; Arjan H Schoneveld; Jiong-Wei Wang; Sander M van de Weg; Siu Kwan Sze; J Karlijn van Keulen; Arno W Hoes; Hester M den Ruijter; Dominique Pv de Kleijn; Arend Mosterd
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.