OBJECTIVES: We reviewed changes in blood glucose, blood pressure, and cholesterol levels among American Indians and Alaska Natives between 1995 and 2001 to estimate the quality of diabetes care in the Indian Health Service (IHS) health care delivery system. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Indian Health Service Diabetes Care and Outcomes Audit. RESULTS: Adjusted mean Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (7.9% vs 8.9%) and mean diastolic blood pressure levels (76 vs 79 mm Hg) were lower in 2001 than in 1995, respectively. A similar pattern was observed for mean total cholesterol (193 vs 208 mg/dL) and triglyceride (235 vs 257 mg/dL) levels in 2001 and 1995, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We identified changes in intermediate clinical outcomes over the period from 1995 to 2001 that may reflect the global impact of increased resource allocation and improvements in processes on the quality of diabetes care, and we describe the results that may be achieved when community, health program, and congressional initiatives focus on common goals.
OBJECTIVES: We reviewed changes in blood glucose, blood pressure, and cholesterol levels among American Indians and Alaska Natives between 1995 and 2001 to estimate the quality of diabetes care in the Indian Health Service (IHS) health care delivery system. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Indian Health Service Diabetes Care and Outcomes Audit. RESULTS: Adjusted mean Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (7.9% vs 8.9%) and mean diastolic blood pressure levels (76 vs 79 mm Hg) were lower in 2001 than in 1995, respectively. A similar pattern was observed for mean total cholesterol (193 vs 208 mg/dL) and triglyceride (235 vs 257 mg/dL) levels in 2001 and 1995, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We identified changes in intermediate clinical outcomes over the period from 1995 to 2001 that may reflect the global impact of increased resource allocation and improvements in processes on the quality of diabetes care, and we describe the results that may be achieved when community, health program, and congressional initiatives focus on common goals.
Authors: K J Acton; R Shields; S Rith-Najarian; B Tolbert; J Kelly; K Moore; L Valdez; B Skipper; D Gohdes Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: B V Howard; E T Lee; L D Cowan; R B Devereux; J M Galloway; O T Go; W J Howard; E R Rhoades; D C Robbins; M L Sievers; T K Welty Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-05-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: L Hansson; A Zanchetti; S G Carruthers; B Dahlöf; D Elmfeldt; S Julius; J Ménard; K H Rahn; H Wedel; S Westerling Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-06-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Thomas D Sequist; Theresa Cullen; Kenneth Bernard; Shimon Shaykevich; E John Orav; John Z Ayanian Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-12-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Helen C Looker; Jonathan Krakoff; Vickie Andre; Kathy Kobus; Robert G Nelson; William C Knowler; Robert L Hanson Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-09-20 Impact factor: 17.152