Literature DB >> 16051309

Longitudinal changes of optical aberrations in normal and form-deprived myopic chick eyes.

E García de la Cera1, G Rodríguez, S Marcos.   

Abstract

We performed measurements of refraction (with retinoscopy), axial length (with ultrasound biometry) and ocular aberrations (with a custom-built Hartmann-Shack aberrometer) on seven awake White-Leghorn chicks occluded monolaterally with diffusers for two weeks. Treatment started on the first day after hatching (day 0) and measurements were conducted on several days between day 0 and 13. Non-occluded eyes experienced normal emmetropization (decreasing hyperopia at 0.2 +/- 0.09 D/day and increasing axial length at 0.05 +/- 0.03 mm/day), while occluded eyes developed axial myopia (1.50 +/- 0.2 D/day and 0.12 +/- 0.02 mm/day). Interocular differences in refraction and axial length by day 13 were on average 17.43 D and 0.86 mm, respectively. Monochromatic high order aberrations decreased with age in both eyes. Average RMS (for 1.5 mm pupil diameter) decreased from 0.11 +/- 0.03 at day 0 to 0.06 +/- 0.03 microm (day 13) in occluded eyes, and from 0.12 +/- 0.05 to 0.03 +/- 0.01 microm in non-occluded eyes. MTF-based optical quality metrics also show an improvement with age. However, while this improvement occurs in both eyes, after day 8 myopic eyes tend to show significantly higher amounts of aberrations (and consequently worse best-corrected optical quality) than normal eyes. The degradation imposed by aberrations is small compared to that imposed by defocus and the diffuser. These results suggest a decrease of aberrations during development which does not seem to be visually guided. Myopic eyes showed slightly worse optical quality than normal eyes, suggesting that the geometrical changes resulting from excessive ocular axial growth also affect the optical quality of the ocular components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16051309     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  13 in total

1.  Single cell imaging of the chick retina with adaptive optics.

Authors:  Kenneth Headington; Stacey S Choi; Debora Nickla; Nathan Doble
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.424

2.  Monochromatic ocular wave aberrations in young monkeys.

Authors:  Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Chea-su Kee; Li-Fang Hung; Ying Qiao-Grider; Austin Roorda; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Aberrations of chick eyes during normal growth and lens induction of myopia.

Authors:  Marsha L Kisilak; Melanie C W Campbell; Jennifer J Hunter; Elizabeth L Irving; Lan Huang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Comparison of form-deprived myopia and lens-induced myopia in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Hui Xiao; Zhong-Yi Fan; Xiao-Dan Tian; Yan-Chun Xu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Ocular wavefront aberrations in the common marmoset Callithrix jacchus: effects of age and refractive error.

Authors:  Nancy J Coletta; Susana Marcos; David Troilo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Visually guided chick ocular length and structural thickness variations assessed by swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Feng Yan; Chen Wang; Jayla A Wilson; Michael O'Connell; Sam Ton; Noah Davidson; Mourren Sibichan; Kari Chambers; Ahmed Ahmed; Jody Summers; Qinggong Tang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Wave aberrations in rhesus monkeys with vision-induced ametropias.

Authors:  Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Chea-Su Kee; Li-Fang Hung; Ying Qiao-Grider; Juan Huang; Austin Roorda; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The significance of retinal image contrast and spatial frequency composition for eye growth modulation in young chicks.

Authors:  Nina Tran; Sara Chiu; Yibin Tian; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Three-dimensional OCT based guinea pig eye model: relating morphology and optics.

Authors:  Pablo Pérez-Merino; Miriam Velasco-Ocana; Eduardo Martinez-Enriquez; Luis Revuelta; Sally A McFadden; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.