Literature DB >> 16051036

A comparison of T2*-weighted magnitude and phase imaging for measuring the arterial input function in the rat aorta following intravenous injection of gadolinium contrast agent.

Greg O Cron1, Julia C Wallace, W Dale Stevens, Teresa Fortin, Bruce A Pappas, Ruth C Wilkins, Frederick Kelcz, Giles E Santyr.   

Abstract

The arterial input function (AIF) is important for quantitative MR imaging perfusion experiments employing Gd contrast agents. This study compared the accuracy of T(2)*-weighted magnitude and phase imaging for noninvasive measurement of the AIF in the rat aorta. Twenty-eight in vivo experiments were performed involving simultaneous arterial blood sampling and MR imaging following Gd injection. In vitro experiments were also performed to confirm the in vivo results. At 1.89 T and TE=3 ms, the relationship between changes in 1/T(2)* in blood (estimated from MR signal magnitude) and Gd concentration ([Gd]) was measured to be approximately 19 s(-1) mM(-1), while that between phase and [Gd] was approximately 0.19 rad mM(-1). Both of these values are consistent with previously published results. The in vivo phase data had approximately half as much scatter with respect to [Gd] than the in vivo magnitude data (r(2)=.34 vs. r(2)=.17, respectively). This is likely due to the fact that the estimated change in 1/T(2)* is more sensitive than the phase to a variety of factors such as partial volume effects and T(1) weighting. Therefore, this study indicates that phase imaging may be a preferred method for measuring the AIF in the rat aorta compared to T(2)*-weighted magnitude imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16051036     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  5 in total

1.  Imaging the extracellular pH of tumors by MRI after injection of a single cocktail of T1 and T2 contrast agents.

Authors:  Gary V Martinez; Xiaomeng Zhang; María L García-Martín; David L Morse; Mark Woods; A Dean Sherry; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Arterial input functions determined from MR signal magnitude and phase for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the human pelvis.

Authors:  Greg O Cron; Claire Foottit; Thomas E Yankeelov; Leonard I Avruch; Mark E Schweitzer; Ian Cameron
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Phase-based arterial input functions in humans applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: potential usefulness and limitations.

Authors:  Anders Garpebring; Ronnie Wirestam; Jun Yu; Thomas Asklund; Mikael Karlsson
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-05-29       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Nathanael Kim; Yulia Lakhman; Ramin Jafari; Alberto Vargas; Ricardo Otazo
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.478

Review 5.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI to Study Atherosclerotic Plaque Microvasculature.

Authors:  Raf H M van Hoof; Sylvia Heeneman; Joachim E Wildberger; M Eline Kooi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.113

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.