BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians are positioned to provide early recognition and treatment of dementia. We evaluated the feasibility and utility of a comprehensive screening and diagnosis program for dementia in primary care. METHODS: We screened individuals aged 65 and older attending 7 urban and racially diverse primary care practices in Indianapolis. Dementia was diagnosed according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 criteria by an expert panel using the results of neuropsychologic testing and information collected from patients, caregivers, and medical records. RESULTS: Among 3,340 patients screened, 434 scored positive but only 227 would agree to a formal diagnostic assessment. Among those who completed the diagnostic assessment, 47% were diagnosed with dementia, 33% had cognitive impairment-no dementia (CIND), and 20% were considered to have no cognitive deficit. The overall estimated prevalence of dementia was 6.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.5% to 6.6%) and the overall estimate of the program cost was $128 per patient screened for dementia and $3,983 per patient diagnosed with dementia. Only 19% of patients with confirmed dementia diagnosis had documentation of dementia in their medical record. CONCLUSIONS: Dementia is common and undiagnosed in primary care. Screening instruments alone have insufficient specificity to establish a valid diagnosis of dementia when used in a comprehensive screening program; these results may not be generalized to older adults presenting with cognitive complaints. Multiple health system and patient-level factors present barriers to this formal assessment and thus render the current standard of care for dementia diagnosis impractical in primary care settings.
BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians are positioned to provide early recognition and treatment of dementia. We evaluated the feasibility and utility of a comprehensive screening and diagnosis program for dementia in primary care. METHODS: We screened individuals aged 65 and older attending 7 urban and racially diverse primary care practices in Indianapolis. Dementia was diagnosed according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 criteria by an expert panel using the results of neuropsychologic testing and information collected from patients, caregivers, and medical records. RESULTS: Among 3,340 patients screened, 434 scored positive but only 227 would agree to a formal diagnostic assessment. Among those who completed the diagnostic assessment, 47% were diagnosed with dementia, 33% had cognitive impairment-no dementia (CIND), and 20% were considered to have no cognitive deficit. The overall estimated prevalence of dementia was 6.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.5% to 6.6%) and the overall estimate of the program cost was $128 per patient screened for dementia and $3,983 per patient diagnosed with dementia. Only 19% of patients with confirmed dementia diagnosis had documentation of dementia in their medical record. CONCLUSIONS:Dementia is common and undiagnosed in primary care. Screening instruments alone have insufficient specificity to establish a valid diagnosis of dementia when used in a comprehensive screening program; these results may not be generalized to older adults presenting with cognitive complaints. Multiple health system and patient-level factors present barriers to this formal assessment and thus render the current standard of care for dementia diagnosis impractical in primary care settings.
Authors: D A Evans; H H Funkenstein; M S Albert; P A Scherr; N R Cook; M J Chown; L E Hebert; C H Hennekens; J O Taylor Journal: JAMA Date: 1989-11-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: M Ganguli; G Ratcliff; F J Huff; S Belle; M J Kancel; L Fischer; E C Seaberg; L H Kuller Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 1991 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: J C Morris; A Heyman; R C Mohs; J P Hughes; G van Belle; G Fillenbaum; E D Mellits; C Clark Journal: Neurology Date: 1989-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Malaz A Boustani; Greg A Sachs; Catherine A Alder; Stephanie Munger; Cathy C Schubert; Mary Guerriero Austrom; Ann M Hake; Frederick W Unverzagt; Martin Farlow; Brandy R Matthews; Anthony J Perkins; Robin A Beck; Christopher M Callahan Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Jin H Han; Suzanne N Bryce; E Wesley Ely; Sunil Kripalani; Alessandro Morandi; Ayumi Shintani; James C Jackson; Alan B Storrow; Robert S Dittus; John Schnelle Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Linda Boise; Elizabeth Eckstrom; Lyle Fagnan; Anne King; Monica Goubaud; David I Buckley; Cynthia Morris Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Manish N Shah; Courtney M C Jones; Thomas M Richardson; Yeates Conwell; Paul Katz; Sandra M Schneider Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Rachelle S Doody; Steven H Ferris; Stephen Salloway; Thomas M Meuser; Anita K Murthy; Chunming Li; Robert Goldman Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.859