Literature DB >> 16049976

Outcome of screening by clinical examination of the breast in a trial in the Philippines.

Paola Pisani1, D M Parkin, Corazon Ngelangel, Divina Esteban, Lorna Gibson, Marilou Munson, Mary Grace Reyes, Adriano Laudico.   

Abstract

The value of screening by Clinical Examination of the Breast (CBE) as a means of reducing mortality from breast cancer (BC) is not established. The issue is relevant, as CBE may be a suitable option for countries in economic transition, where incidence rates are on the increase but limited resources do not permit screening by mammography. Our aims were to assess whether mass screening by CBE carried out by trained para-medical personnel is feasible in an urban population of a low-income country, and its efficacy in reducing BC mortality. Our study was designed as a randomised controlled trial of the effect on BC mortality of 5 annual CBE carried out by trained nurses. The target population was women aged 35-64 years, resident in 12 municipalities of the National Capital Region of Manila, Philippines. The units of randomization were the 202 health centres (HC) within the selected municipalities. During 1995 nurses and midwives were recruited and trained in performing CBE. The first round of screening took place in 1996-1997. The intervention however showed a refractory attitude of the population with respect to clinical follow-up and was discontinued after the completion of the first screening round. Cases of breast cancer occurring in the study population during 1996-1999 were identified by the 2 local population-based registries. In the single screening round 151,168 women were interviewed and offered CBE, 92% accepted (138,392), 3,479 were detected positive for a lump and referred for diagnosis. Of these only 1220 women (35%) completed diagnostic follow-up, whereas 42.4% actively refused further investigation even with home visits, and 22.5% were not traced. Of 53 cases that occurred among screen-positive women in the 2 years after CBE only 34 were diagnosed through the intervention. Eighty cases occurred among screen-negative women. The test sensitivity for CBE repeated annually was 53.2%. The actual sensitivity of the programme was 25.6% and positive predictive value 1%. Screen-detected cases were non-significantly less advanced than the others. Previous studies have shown that most breast cancer cases in the Philippines present at advanced stages and have an unfavourable outcome. Although CBE undertaken by health workers seems to offer a cost-effective approach to reducing mortality, the sensitivity of the screening programme in the real context was low. Moreover, in this relatively well-educated population, cultural and logistic barriers to seeking diagnosis and treatment persist and need to be addressed before any screening programme is introduced. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16049976     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  47 in total

Review 1.  Improving outcomes in breast cancer for low and middle income countries.

Authors:  C H Yip; I Buccimazza; M Hartman; S V S Deo; P S Y Cheung
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Cost-effectiveness of clinical breast assessment-based screening in rural Egypt.

Authors:  Adel Denewer; Osama Hussein; Omar Farouk; Waleed Elnahas; Ashraf Khater; Aiman El-Saed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  A swarm optimized neural network system for classification of microcalcification in mammograms.

Authors:  J Dheeba; S Tamil Selvi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Practical Applications for Clinical Breast Examination (CBE) and Breast Self-Examination (BSE) in Screening and Early Detection of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Pointing the way to informed medical decision making: test characteristics of clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Mary B Barton; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Effect of VIA screening by primary health workers: randomized controlled study in Mumbai, India.

Authors:  Surendra S Shastri; Indraneel Mittra; Gauravi A Mishra; Subhadra Gupta; Rajesh Dikshit; Shalini Singh; Rajendra A Badwe
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries.

Authors:  Meteb Al-Foheidi; Mubarak M Al-Mansour; Ezzeldin M Ibrahim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Kari Tyne; Arpana Naik; Christina Bougatsos; Benjamin K Chan; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Breast Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities to Reduce Mortality.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Lawrence N Shulman
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-04-18

10.  Ovarian cancer survival population differences: a "high resolution study" comparing Philippine residents, and Filipino-Americans and Caucasians living in the US.

Authors:  Maria Theresa M Redaniel; Adriano Laudico; Maria Rica Mirasol-Lumague; Adam Gondos; Gemma Leonora Uy; Jean Ann Toral; Doris Benavides; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.