PURPOSE: The leading causes of premature death in the United States are linked to 4 behaviors: smoking, unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, and risky alcohol use. We report lessons from 17 exploratory projects funded under Prescription for Health that tested the feasibility of innovative behavior change strategies for at least 2 of these behaviors in primary care practices. METHODS: Seventeen practice-based research networks (PBRNs) implemented and evaluated tools, cues, and techniques in 120 family medicine, internal medicine, pediatric, and nursing practices across an ethnically diverse sample of adults, children, and adolescents in rural and urban settings. We reviewed progress reports and notes from site visits and 3 meetings to generate overarching lessons. RESULTS: PBRNs successfully implemented their projects in diverse practices despite reported logistical challenges and practice constraints. The networks showed that distributing the effort across the care team and throughout the practice and community is possible. Although each behavior required specific attention, each did not require its own separate staff and system. Three models emerged as helpful guides for the comprehensive redesign of health behavior counseling, but they require adaptation for use in real-world primary care settings. Traditional methods of collaboration yielded mixed results, making obvious a need for dedicated collaboration funds and a better framework to identify and align high-yield opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: These projects confirm the feasibility of health behavior counseling in primary care practice. They also highlight the need for substantive practice redesign, and the value of models and frameworks to guide redesign and collaborative efforts.
PURPOSE: The leading causes of premature death in the United States are linked to 4 behaviors: smoking, unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, and risky alcohol use. We report lessons from 17 exploratory projects funded under Prescription for Health that tested the feasibility of innovative behavior change strategies for at least 2 of these behaviors in primary care practices. METHODS: Seventeen practice-based research networks (PBRNs) implemented and evaluated tools, cues, and techniques in 120 family medicine, internal medicine, pediatric, and nursing practices across an ethnically diverse sample of adults, children, and adolescents in rural and urban settings. We reviewed progress reports and notes from site visits and 3 meetings to generate overarching lessons. RESULTS: PBRNs successfully implemented their projects in diverse practices despite reported logistical challenges and practice constraints. The networks showed that distributing the effort across the care team and throughout the practice and community is possible. Although each behavior required specific attention, each did not require its own separate staff and system. Three models emerged as helpful guides for the comprehensive redesign of health behavior counseling, but they require adaptation for use in real-world primary care settings. Traditional methods of collaboration yielded mixed results, making obvious a need for dedicated collaboration funds and a better framework to identify and align high-yield opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: These projects confirm the feasibility of health behavior counseling in primary care practice. They also highlight the need for substantive practice redesign, and the value of models and frameworks to guide redesign and collaborative efforts.
Authors: Lawrence J Fine; G Stephane Philogene; Robert Gramling; Elliot J Coups; Sarbajit Sinha Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Steven H Woolf; Russell E Glasgow; Alex Krist; Claudia Bartz; Susan A Flocke; Jodi Summers Holtrop; Stephen F Rothemich; Ellen R Wald Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: James C Martin; Robert F Avant; Marjorie A Bowman; John R Bucholtz; John R Dickinson; Kenneth L Evans; Larry A Green; Douglas E Henley; Warren A Jones; Samuel C Matheny; Janice E Nevin; Sandra L Panther; James C Puffer; Richard G Roberts; Denise V Rodgers; Roger A Sherwood; Kurt C Stange; Cynthia W Weber Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Deborah S Porterfield; Laurie W Hinnant; Heather Kane; Joseph Horne; Kelly McAleer; Amy Roussel Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Linda Boise; Elizabeth Eckstrom; Lyle Fagnan; Anne King; Monica Goubaud; David I Buckley; Cynthia Morris Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Steven H Woolf; Russell E Glasgow; Alex Krist; Claudia Bartz; Susan A Flocke; Jodi Summers Holtrop; Stephen F Rothemich; Ellen R Wald Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Deborah Parra-Medina; Sara Wilcox; Dawn K Wilson; Cheryl L Addy; Gwen Felton; Mary Beth Poston Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Robert L Ferrer; Priti Mody-Bailey; Carlos Roberto Jaén; Sherrie Gott; Sara Araujo Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166