Literature DB >> 16046284

Chromatin and the DNA damage response.

David Lydall1, Simon Whitehall.   

Abstract

The impact of chromatin structure upon the DNA damage response is becoming increasingly apparent. We can reasonably expect many more papers showing how chromatin and chromatin modifications impact upon aspects of the DNA damage response. Here, we present our perspective on some recent developments in this exciting area of cell biology. We aim that this review will be of interest to those who study the DNA damage response, but not usually in the context of chromatin, and equally to those who study chromatin, but not the DNA damage response. It seems likely that these two communities will increasingly share common questions and interests.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16046284     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  11 in total

Review 1.  DNA damage responses in neural cells: Focus on the telomere.

Authors:  P Zhang; C Dilley; M P Mattson
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  The Dot1 histone methyltransferase and the Rad9 checkpoint adaptor contribute to cohesin-dependent double-strand break repair by sister chromatid recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Francisco Conde; Esther Refolio; Violeta Cordón-Preciado; Felipe Cortés-Ledesma; Luis Aragón; Andrés Aguilera; Pedro A San-Segundo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Replication termination at eukaryotic chromosomes is mediated by Top2 and occurs at genomic loci containing pausing elements.

Authors:  Daniele Fachinetti; Rodrigo Bermejo; Andrea Cocito; Simone Minardi; Yuki Katou; Yutaka Kanoh; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Anna Azvolinsky; Virginia A Zakian; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  No attenuation of the ATM-dependent DNA damage response in murine telomerase-deficient cells.

Authors:  Natalie Erdmann; Lea A Harrington
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-12-25

5.  Role of Dot1 in the response to alkylating DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: regulation of DNA damage tolerance by the error-prone polymerases Polzeta/Rev1.

Authors:  Francisco Conde; Pedro A San-Segundo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Telomeres, histone code, and DNA damage response.

Authors:  S Misri; S Pandita; R Kumar; T K Pandita
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.636

7.  Top1- and Top2-mediated topological transitions at replication forks ensure fork progression and stability and prevent DNA damage checkpoint activation.

Authors:  Rodrigo Bermejo; Ylli Doksani; Thelma Capra; Yuki-Mori Katou; Hirokazu Tanaka; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies behave as DNA damage sensors whose response to DNA double-strand breaks is regulated by NBS1 and the kinases ATM, Chk2, and ATR.

Authors:  Graham Dellaire; Reagan W Ching; Kashif Ahmed; Farid Jalali; Kenneth C K Tse; Robert G Bristow; David P Bazett-Jones
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Inhibition of histone deacetylase impacts cancer stem cells and induces epithelial-mesenchyme transition of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Fernanda S Giudice; Decio S Pinto; Jacques E Nör; Cristiane H Squarize; Rogerio M Castilho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  ATM-mediated transcriptional and developmental responses to gamma-rays in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Lilian Ricaud; Caroline Proux; Jean-Pierre Renou; Olivier Pichon; Sylvain Fochesato; Philippe Ortet; Marie-Hélène Montané
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.