Literature DB >> 16045987

The role of dopamine in conditioning and latent inhibition: what, when, where and how?

Andrew M J Young1, Paula M Moran, Michael H Joseph.   

Abstract

It is well established that dopamine is released in the nucleus accumbens (NAC) in animals in rewarding or reinforcing situations, and widely believed that this release is the substrate of, or at least closely related to, the experience of reward. The demonstration of conditioned release of dopamine by stimuli conditioned to primary rewards has reinforced this view. However, a number of observations do not sit comfortably with this interpretation, most notably that dopamine is released equally effectively in NAC by aversive stimuli, and stimuli conditioned to them. Furthermore, additional release of dopamine is seen during conditioning, even if motivational stimuli of either type are not involved. It is suggested here that one important action of NAC dopamine release is to restore the salience of potential conditioned stimuli, when this has been reduced by prior un-reinforced experience. The paradigm of latent inhibition (LI) demonstrates a behavioural effect of this type, and extensive studies on the role of dopamine in LI have been undertaken by us and others. Those studies are reviewed here, together with some previously unpublished data, to demonstrate that (1) amphetamine disruption of LI is indeed a function of calcium-dependant dopamine release in the NAC at the time of conditioning; (2) other drugs acting on LI via changes in dopamine transmission act at the same locus; (3) the disruptive effect of indirect dopamine agonists on LI can be prevented by either D-1 selective receptor antagonists, or D-2 selective receptor antagonists. It is concluded that dopamine release in these very varied behavioural contexts (reward, punishment, conditioning, modulation of salience) must be differentiated in some way, and that this should be investigated. An alternative explanation, if they are not differentiated, would be that the release in fact does have the same functional significance in each case. We suggest that this common significance might be the broadening of attention to take in potentially conditionable stimuli, which have previously been devalued.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16045987     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  22 in total

Review 1.  Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting.

Authors:  Ethan S Bromberg-Martin; Masayuki Matsumoto; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Duality of salience in dopamine neurons.

Authors:  David H Root; David J Barker; Sisi Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dopamine neuron dependent behaviors mediated by glutamate cotransmission.

Authors:  Susana Mingote; Nao Chuhma; Abigail Kalmbach; Gretchen M Thomsen; Yvonne Wang; Andra Mihali; Caroline Sferrazza; Ilana Zucker-Scharff; Anna-Claire Siena; Martha G Welch; José Lizardi-Ortiz; David Sulzer; Holly Moore; Inna Gaisler-Salomon; Stephen Rayport
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  Dopamine-glutamate neuron projections to the nucleus accumbens medial shell and behavioral switching.

Authors:  Susana Mingote; Aliza Amsellem; Abigail Kempf; Stephen Rayport; Nao Chuhma
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Effects of novelty and methamphetamine on conditioned and sensory reinforcement.

Authors:  David R Lloyd; Michael A Kausch; Amy M Gancarz; Linda J Beyley; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Exploratory studies in sensory reinforcement in male rats: effects of methamphetamine.

Authors:  Amy M Gancarz; Lisham Ashrafioun; Michele A San George; Kathy A Hausknecht; Larry W Hawk; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Latent inhibition-related dopaminergic responses in the nucleus accumbens are disrupted following neonatal transient inactivation of the ventral subiculum.

Authors:  Francisca F Meyer; Alain Louilot
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Chronic mild stress impairs latent inhibition and induces region-specific neural activation in CHL1-deficient mice, a mouse model of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Mona Buhusi; Daniel Obray; Bret Guercio; Mitchell J Bartlett; Catalin V Buhusi
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Glutamate neurons within the midbrain dopamine regions.

Authors:  M Morales; D H Root
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Enhanced latent inhibition in dopamine receptor-deficient mice is sex-specific for the D1 but not D2 receptor subtype: implications for antipsychotic drug action.

Authors:  Cecilie Bay-Richter; Colm M P O'Tuathaigh; Gerard O'Sullivan; David M Heery; John L Waddington; Paula M Moran
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 5.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.