Literature DB >> 16045621

Large increases in attractant concentration disrupt the polar localization of bacterial chemoreceptors.

Allison C Lamanna1, George W Ordal, Laura L Kiessling.   

Abstract

In bacterial chemotaxis, the chemoreceptors [methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs)] transduce chemotactic signals through the two-component histidine kinase CheA. At low but not high attractant concentrations, chemotactic signals must be amplified. The MCPs are organized into a polar lattice, and this organization has been proposed to be critical for signal amplification. Although evidence in support of this model has emerged, an understanding of how signals are amplified and modulated is lacking. We probed the role of MCP localization under conditions wherein signal amplification must be inhibited. We tested whether a large increase in attractant concentration (a change that should alter receptor occupancy from c. 0% to > 95%) would elicit changes in the chemoreceptor localization. We treated Escherichia coli or Bacillus subtilis with a high level of attractant, exposed cells to the cross-linking agent paraformaldehyde and visualized chemoreceptor location with an anti-MCP antibody. A marked increase in the percentage of cells displaying a diffuse staining pattern was obtained. In contrast, no increase in diffuse MCP staining is observed when cells are treated with a repellent or a low concentration of attractant. For B. subtilis mutants that do not undergo chemotaxis, the addition of a high concentration of attractant has no effect on MCP localization. Our data suggest that interactions between chemoreceptors are decreased when signal amplification is unnecessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16045621     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04728.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  28 in total

1.  Cellular stoichiometry of the chemotaxis proteins in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Vincent J Cannistraro; George D Glekas; Christopher V Rao; George W Ordal
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Insights into the organization and dynamics of bacterial chemoreceptor clusters through in vivo crosslinking studies.

Authors:  Claudia A Studdert; John S Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Attractant binding induces distinct structural changes to the polar and lateral signaling clusters in Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis.

Authors:  Kang Wu; Hanna E Walukiewicz; George D Glekas; George W Ordal; Christopher V Rao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Polar chemoreceptor clustering by coupled trimers of dimers.

Authors:  Robert G Endres
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Isotope-coded affinity tags with tunable reactivities for protein footprinting.

Authors:  Eric S Underbakke; Yimin Zhu; Laura L Kiessling
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Structure of the ternary complex formed by a chemotaxis receptor signaling domain, the CheA histidine kinase, and the coupling protein CheW as determined by pulsed dipolar ESR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Jaya Bhatnagar; Peter P Borbat; Abiola M Pollard; Alexandrine M Bilwes; Jack H Freed; Brian R Crane
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Receptor-receptor coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: evidence for strongly coupled clusters.

Authors:  Monica L Skoge; Robert G Endres; Ned S Wingreen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Ligand affinity and kinase activity are independent of bacterial chemotaxis receptor concentration: insight into signaling mechanisms.

Authors:  Fe C Sferdean; Robert M Weis; Lynmarie K Thompson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 9.  CheV: CheW-like coupling proteins at the core of the chemotaxis signaling network.

Authors:  Roger P Alexander; Andrew C Lowenthal; Rasika M Harshey; Karen M Ottemann
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 17.079

10.  Flow cytometry reveals that multivalent chemoattractants effect swarmer cell dedifferentiation.

Authors:  Allison C Lamanna; Laura L Kiessling
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.100

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.