OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the affect of an antenatal educational breastfeeding intervention on women's breastfeeding duration. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. Unit of randomisation: electoral ward. The primary outcome was the proportion that fulfilled their antenatal breastfeeding expectation. Secondary outcomes were the number of women breastfeeding on discharge and at four months. Data were collected using a series of questionnaires and diaries. SETTING:Teaching hospital in North West of England. PARTICIPANTS: Women who expressed a desire to breast-feed at the start of their pregnancy. METHODS: Women were allocated to either routine antenatal education or an additional single educational group session supervised by a lactation specialist and attended by midwives from their locality. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The proportion of women who fulfilled their expectation of breastfeeding. RESULT: One thousand three hundred and twelve women were randomised, with 1249 (95%) women available for analysis. There was no difference between the groups in the proportion of women who attained their expected duration of breastfeeding (OR 1.2; 95% CI 0.89-1.6; chi(2)= 1.4, df= 1, P= 0.2; mean cluster size 156, design effect 1.6). There were no differences between the groups in the uptake of breastfeeding on discharge (OR = 1.2; 95% CI 0.8-1.7; chi(2)= 1.1, df= 1, P= 0.3; mean cluster size 163, design effect = 2.0) or exclusively at four months (OR = 1.1; 95% CI 0.6-1.8; chi(2)= 0.07, df= 1, P= 0.8; mean cluster size 156, design effect 1.6). CONCLUSION: The provision of a single educational group session supervised by a lactation specialist, and attended by midwives and women, failed to promote the uptake of breastfeeding. Public health interventions, which encourage positive attitudes to breastfeeding within the family and wider community, should be developed and evaluated.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the affect of an antenatal educational breastfeeding intervention on women's breastfeeding duration. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. Unit of randomisation: electoral ward. The primary outcome was the proportion that fulfilled their antenatal breastfeeding expectation. Secondary outcomes were the number of women breastfeeding on discharge and at four months. Data were collected using a series of questionnaires and diaries. SETTING: Teaching hospital in North West of England. PARTICIPANTS: Women who expressed a desire to breast-feed at the start of their pregnancy. METHODS:Women were allocated to either routine antenatal education or an additional single educational group session supervised by a lactation specialist and attended by midwives from their locality. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The proportion of women who fulfilled their expectation of breastfeeding. RESULT: One thousand three hundred and twelve women were randomised, with 1249 (95%) women available for analysis. There was no difference between the groups in the proportion of women who attained their expected duration of breastfeeding (OR 1.2; 95% CI 0.89-1.6; chi(2)= 1.4, df= 1, P= 0.2; mean cluster size 156, design effect 1.6). There were no differences between the groups in the uptake of breastfeeding on discharge (OR = 1.2; 95% CI 0.8-1.7; chi(2)= 1.1, df= 1, P= 0.3; mean cluster size 163, design effect = 2.0) or exclusively at four months (OR = 1.1; 95% CI 0.6-1.8; chi(2)= 0.07, df= 1, P= 0.8; mean cluster size 156, design effect 1.6). CONCLUSION: The provision of a single educational group session supervised by a lactation specialist, and attended by midwives and women, failed to promote the uptake of breastfeeding. Public health interventions, which encourage positive attitudes to breastfeeding within the family and wider community, should be developed and evaluated.
Authors: Olukunmi O Balogun; Elizabeth J O'Sullivan; Alison McFadden; Erika Ota; Anna Gavine; Christine D Garner; Mary J Renfrew; Stephen MacGillivray Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-11-09
Authors: Alison McFadden; Anna Gavine; Mary J Renfrew; Angela Wade; Phyll Buchanan; Jane L Taylor; Emma Veitch; Anne Marie Rennie; Susan A Crowther; Sara Neiman; Stephen MacGillivray Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-02-28