Literature DB >> 16045419

Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making.

George Loewenstein1.   

Abstract

Prior research has shown that people mispredict their own behavior and preferences across affective states. When people are in an affectively "cold" state, they fail to fully appreciate how "hot" states will affect their own preferences and behavior. When in hot states, they underestimate the influence of those states and, as a result, overestimate the stability of their current preferences. The same biases apply interpersonally; for example, people who are not affectively aroused underappreciate the impact of hot states on other people's behavior. After reviewing research documenting such intrapersonal and interpersonal hot-cold empathy gaps, this article examines their consequences for medical, and specifically cancer-related, decision making, showing, for example, that hot-cold empathy gaps can lead healthy persons to expose themselves excessively to health risks and can cause health care providers to undertreat patients for pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16045419     DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  61 in total

Review 1.  Interoceptive dysfunction: toward an integrated framework for understanding somatic and affective disturbance in depression.

Authors:  Christopher Harshaw
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Health insurance coverage and take-up: lessons from behavioral economics.

Authors:  Katherine Baicker; William J Congdon; Sendhil Mullainathan
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 3.  End-of-life planning and its relevance for patients' and oncologists' decisions in choosing cancer therapy.

Authors:  Biren Saraiya; Susan Bodnar-Deren; Elaine Leventhal; Howard Leventhal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Risk as feelings in the effect of patient outcomes on physicians' future treatment decisions: a randomized trial and manipulation validation.

Authors:  Joshua A Hemmerich; Arthur S Elstein; Margaret L Schwarze; Elizabeth Ghini Moliski; William Dale
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Palliative care in cancer: enhancing our view with the science of emotion and decision making.

Authors:  Lynne S Padgett; Rebecca A Ferrer
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Paternalism, autonomy and ontology.

Authors:  Max Grinberg; Antonio Sergio de Santis Andrade Lopes
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 7.  Affective forecasting: an unrecognized challenge in making serious health decisions.

Authors:  Jodi Halpern; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Association between anticipatory grief and problem solving among family caregivers of persons with cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Nicole R Fowler; Alexandra S Hansen; Amber E Barnato; Linda Garand
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2013-02-20

9.  What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Sarah E Lillie; Dana L Alden; Laura Scherer; Megan Oser; Christine Rini; Miho Tanaka; John Baleix; Mikki Brewster; Simon Craddock Lee; Mary K Goldstein; Robert M Jacobson; Ronald E Myers; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Erika A Waters
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08-26

10.  Closing the empathy gap in college students' judgments of end-of-life tradeoffs.

Authors:  Joseph D W Stephens; Danielle S Neal; Amy A Overman
Journal:  Int J Psychol       Date:  2013-11-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.