Literature DB >> 16045306

Interpreting computational neural network quantitative structure-activity relationship models: a detailed interpretation of the weights and biases.

Rajarshi Guha1, David T Stanton, Peter C Jurs.   

Abstract

In this work, we present a methodology to interpret the weights and biases of a computational neural network (CNN) quantitative structure-activity relationship model. The methodology allows one to understand how an input descriptor is correlated to the predicted output by the network. The method consists of two parts. First, the nonlinear transform for a given neuron is linearized. This allows us to determine how a given neuron affects the downstream output. Next, a ranking scheme for neurons in a layer is developed. This allows us to develop interpretations of a CNN model similar in manner to the partial least squares (PLS) interpretation method for linear models described by Stanton. The method is tested on three datasets covering both physical and biological properties. The results of this interpretation method correspond well to PLS interpretations for linear models using the same descriptors as the CNN models, and they are consistent with the generally accepted physical interpretations for these properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16045306     DOI: 10.1021/ci050110v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  12 in total

1.  QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to?

Authors:  Artem Cherkasov; Eugene N Muratov; Denis Fourches; Alexandre Varnek; Igor I Baskin; Mark Cronin; John Dearden; Paola Gramatica; Yvonne C Martin; Roberto Todeschini; Viviana Consonni; Victor E Kuz'min; Richard Cramer; Romualdo Benigni; Chihae Yang; James Rathman; Lothar Terfloth; Johann Gasteiger; Ann Richard; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  On the interpretation and interpretability of quantitative structure-activity relationship models.

Authors:  Rajarshi Guha
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  QSAR models for predicting the activity of non-peptide luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonists derived from erythromycin A using quantum chemical properties.

Authors:  Michael Fernández; Julio Caballero
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Hybrid-genetic algorithm based descriptor optimization and QSAR models for predicting the biological activity of Tipranavir analogs for HIV protease inhibition.

Authors:  A Srinivas Reddy; Sunil Kumar; Rajni Garg
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.518

5.  BCL::Mol2D-a robust atom environment descriptor for QSAR modeling and lead optimization.

Authors:  Oanh Vu; Jeffrey Mendenhall; Doaa Altarawy; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Model calcium sensors for network homeostasis: sensor and readout parameter analysis from a database of model neuronal networks.

Authors:  Cengiz Günay; Astrid A Prinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Computational neural network analysis of the affinity of N-n-alkylnicotinium salts for the alpha4beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  Fang Zheng; Guangrong Zheng; A Gabriela Deaciuc; Chang-Guo Zhan; Linda P Dwoskin; Peter A Crooks
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.051

Review 8.  Considerations and recent advances in QSAR models for cytochrome P450-mediated drug metabolism prediction.

Authors:  Haiyan Li; Jin Sun; Xiaowen Fan; Xiaofan Sui; Lan Zhang; Yongjun Wang; Zhonggui He
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  On exploring structure-activity relationships.

Authors:  Rajarshi Guha
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

10.  Feature combination networks for the interpretation of statistical machine learning models: application to Ames mutagenicity.

Authors:  Samuel J Webb; Thierry Hanser; Brendan Howlin; Paul Krause; Jonathan D Vessey
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 5.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.