Literature DB >> 16044351

Improved water retention links high species richness with increased productivity in arctic tundra moss communities.

Christian Rixen1, Christa P H Mulder.   

Abstract

A positive relationship between plant species richness and ecosystem functioning has been found in a number of experimental studies. Positive species interactions at high species numbers have been suggested as a cause, but mechanisms driving positive interactions have not often been tested. In this experiment we asked three questions: (1) What is the relationship between species richness and productivity in experimentally constructed moss communities? (2) Is this relationship affected by plant density? and (3) Can changes in moisture absorption and retention explain observed relationships? To answer these questions we exposed arctic tundra moss communities of different species richness levels (1-11 species) and two different densities in the greenhouse to two levels of drought (short and long). Biomass (by the community and individual species), height and community moisture absorption and retention were measured as response variables. High species diversity increased productivity (more so in low-density plots than in high-density plots), but only when plots were watered regularly. Plot moisture retention was improved at high species richness as well, and plant height and variation in height was increased compared to plants in monoculture. Under high-density and short-drought conditions 10 out of 12 species grew better in mixture than in monoculture, but under the long drought treatment only six species did. A positive feedback loop between biomass and improved humidity under high diversity was supported by path analysis. We conclude that in this community the relationship between species richness and productivity depends on moisture availability and density, with improved water absorption and retention likely to be the mechanism for increased plant growth when drought periods are short. Furthermore, since this is the opposite of what has been found for temperate moss communities, conclusions from one system cannot automatically be extrapolated to other systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16044351     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0196-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition.

Authors:  P B Reich; J Knops; D Tilman; J Craine; D Ellsworth; M Tjoelker; T Lee; D Wedin; S Naeem; D Bahauddin; G Hendrey; S Jose; K Wrage; J Goth; W Bengston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation.

Authors:  Bradley J Cardinale; Margaret A Palmer; Scott L Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment.

Authors:  D Tilman; P B Reich; J Knops; D Wedin; T Mielke; C Lehman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges.

Authors:  M Loreau; S Naeem; P Inchausti; J Bengtsson; J P Grime; A Hector; D U Hooper; M A Huston; D Raffaelli; B Schmid; D Tilman; D A Wardle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments.

Authors:  M Loreau; A Hector
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Physical stress and diversity-productivity relationships: the role of positive interactions.

Authors:  C P Mulder; D D Uliassi; D F Doak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity.

Authors:  M A Huston; L W Aarssen; M P Austin; B S Cade; J D Fridley; E Garnier; J P Grime; J Hodgson; W K Lauenroth; K Thompson; J H Vandermeer; D A Wardle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-08-25       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress.

Authors:  Ragan M Callaway; R W Brooker; Philippe Choler; Zaal Kikvidze; Christopher J Lortie; Richard Michalet; Leonardo Paolini; Francisco I Pugnaire; Beth Newingham; Erik T Aschehoug; Cristina Armas; David Kikodze; Bradley J Cook
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Positive interactions in communities.

Authors:  M D Bertness; R Callaway
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity.

Authors:  Michael A Huston
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  12 in total

1.  A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change.

Authors:  David U Hooper; E Carol Adair; Bradley J Cardinale; Jarrett E K Byrnes; Bruce A Hungate; Kristin L Matulich; Andrew Gonzalez; J Emmett Duffy; Lars Gamfeldt; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Can complementarity in water use help to explain diversity-productivity relationships in experimental grassland plots?

Authors:  Kris Verheyen; Hugo Bulteel; Cecilia Palmborg; Bert Olivié; Ivan Nijs; Dirk Raes; Bart Muys
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Switch between competition and facilitation within a seasonal scale at colony level in bryophytes.

Authors:  Daniel Spitale
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Dispersal and life history strategies in epiphyte metacommunities: alternative solutions to survival in patchy, dynamic landscapes.

Authors:  Swantje Löbel; Håkan Rydin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The advantage of growing on moss: facilitative effects on photosynthetic performance and growth in the cyanobacterial lichen Peltigera rufescens.

Authors:  Claudia Colesie; Sarah Scheu; T G Allan Green; Bettina Weber; Rainer Wirth; Burkhard Büdel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Could the canopy structure of bryophytes serve as an indicator of microbial biodiversity? A test for testate amoebae and microcrustaceans from a subtropical cloud forest in Dominican Republic.

Authors:  D Acosta-Mercado; N Cancel-Morales; J D Chinea; C J Santos-Flores; I Sastre De Jesús
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 7.  Comparative cryptogam ecology: a review of bryophyte and lichen traits that drive biogeochemistry.

Authors:  Johannes H C Cornelissen; Simone I Lang; Nadejda A Soudzilovskaia; Heinjo J During
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Per capita interactions and stress tolerance drive stress-induced changes in biodiversity effects on ecosystem functions.

Authors:  Jan M Baert; Colin R Janssen; Koen Sabbe; Frederik De Laender
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Plant-plant interactions change during succession on nurse logs in a northern temperate rainforest.

Authors:  Carrie L Woods; Katy Maleta; Kimmy Ortmann
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Non-additive increases in sediment stability are generated by macroinvertebrate species interactions in laboratory streams.

Authors:  Lindsey K Albertson; Bradley J Cardinale; Leonard S Sklar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.