UNLABELLED: The authors conducted an 8-year prospective non-randomised study to determine whether dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) would reduce late anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in patients treated in childhood for haematological malignancy. The authors examined prospectively 75 patients (40 male/35 female) aged 2-17 years (median 6.5 years) at the time of diagnosis. The cardioprotection was given to 53 patients (26 male/17 female) and the standard protocol was used in 22 patients (14 male/8 female). The prospective echocardiographic evaluation was done before and after the chemotherapy and every year during the follow-up period. Dynamic stress echocardiography (DSE) was assessed in the final year. The clinical cardiotoxicity was not diagnosed. Higher cumulative doses of anthracycline were given in the dexrazoxane group (234+/-58 mg/m(2), median 240 mg/m(2) versus 203+/-86 mg/m(2), median 210 mg/m(2), P <0.04) and a significantly higher percentage of patients received cumulative doses >240 mg/m(2) of anthracycline ( P <0.05). During the follow-up period, the fractional shortening (FS) declined in the no-dexrazoxane group only in the 8th year and was significantly lower compared to the dexrazoxane group ( P <0.05). The pathological decrease in FS was present in 24% of patients; 41% in the no-dexrazoxane and 17% in the dexrazoxane groups, respectively ( P <0.05). DSE demonstrated lower rest EF and cardiac index (CI) in the no-dexrazoxane group ( P <0.05); however, neither the response of EF and CI to the stress echocardiography nor the exercise tolerance significantly differed between sub-groups. A higher number of patients in the dexrazoxane group had very good exercise tolerance (ET) >3 Watts/kg ( P <0.05) and a lower number responded with a decreased ET <2 Watts/kg ( P <0.05) compared to the no-dexrazoxane group. CONCLUSION: Dexrazoxane seems to reduce the risk of late subclinical cardiotoxicity. Dexrazoxane-treated patients revealed better exercise tolerance; however the haemodynamic response to the stress was no different in both sub-groups.
UNLABELLED: The authors conducted an 8-year prospective non-randomised study to determine whether dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) would reduce late anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in patients treated in childhood for haematological malignancy. The authors examined prospectively 75 patients (40 male/35 female) aged 2-17 years (median 6.5 years) at the time of diagnosis. The cardioprotection was given to 53 patients (26 male/17 female) and the standard protocol was used in 22 patients (14 male/8 female). The prospective echocardiographic evaluation was done before and after the chemotherapy and every year during the follow-up period. Dynamic stress echocardiography (DSE) was assessed in the final year. The clinical cardiotoxicity was not diagnosed. Higher cumulative doses of anthracycline were given in the dexrazoxane group (234+/-58 mg/m(2), median 240 mg/m(2) versus 203+/-86 mg/m(2), median 210 mg/m(2), P <0.04) and a significantly higher percentage of patients received cumulative doses >240 mg/m(2) of anthracycline ( P <0.05). During the follow-up period, the fractional shortening (FS) declined in the no-dexrazoxane group only in the 8th year and was significantly lower compared to the dexrazoxane group ( P <0.05). The pathological decrease in FS was present in 24% of patients; 41% in the no-dexrazoxane and 17% in the dexrazoxane groups, respectively ( P <0.05). DSE demonstrated lower rest EF and cardiac index (CI) in the no-dexrazoxane group ( P <0.05); however, neither the response of EF and CI to the stress echocardiography nor the exercise tolerance significantly differed between sub-groups. A higher number of patients in the dexrazoxane group had very good exercise tolerance (ET) >3 Watts/kg ( P <0.05) and a lower number responded with a decreased ET <2 Watts/kg ( P <0.05) compared to the no-dexrazoxane group. CONCLUSION:Dexrazoxane seems to reduce the risk of late subclinical cardiotoxicity. Dexrazoxane-treated patients revealed better exercise tolerance; however the haemodynamic response to the stress was no different in both sub-groups.
Authors: L J Steinherz; T Graham; R Hurwitz; H M Sondheimer; R G Schwartz; E M Shaffer; G Sandor; L Benson; R Williams Journal: Pediatrics Date: 1992-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: G M Felker; R E Thompson; J M Hare; R H Hruban; D E Clemetson; D L Howard; K L Baughman; E K Kasper Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-04-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Steven E Lipshultz; Nader Rifai; Virginia M Dalton; Donna E Levy; Lewis B Silverman; Stuart R Lipsitz; Steven D Colan; Barbara L Asselin; Ronald D Barr; Luis A Clavell; Craig A Hurwitz; Albert Moghrabi; Yvan Samson; Marshall A Schorin; Richard D Gelber; Stephen E Sallan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-07-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: D D Von Hoff; M W Layard; P Basa; H L Davis; A L Von Hoff; M Rozencweig; F M Muggia Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1979-11 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Ricardo H Pignatelli; Payam Ghazi; S Chandra-Bose Reddy; Patrick Thompson; Qiqiong Cui; Jacqueline Castro; Mehmet F Okcu; John Lynn Jefferies Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2015-06-07 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Hyoung Soo Choi; Eun Sil Park; Hyoung Jin Kang; Hee Young Shin; Chung Il Noh; Yong Soo Yun; Hyo Seop Ahn; Jung Yun Choi Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2010-08-12 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Martin Stěrba; Olga Popelová; Anna Vávrová; Eduard Jirkovský; Petra Kovaříková; Vladimír Geršl; Tomáš Simůnek Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Jan M Leerink; Helena J H van der Pal; Leontien C M Kremer; Elizabeth A M Feijen; Paola G Meregalli; Milanthy S Pourier; Remy Merkx; Louise Bellersen; Elvira C van Dalen; Jacqueline Loonen; Yigal M Pinto; Livia Kapusta; Annelies M C Mavinkurve-Groothuis; Wouter E M Kok Journal: JACC CardioOncol Date: 2021-03-16