Literature DB >> 16044181

A survey to investigate movements off sheep and cattle farms in New Zealand, with reference to the potential transmission of foot-and-mouth disease.

R L Sanson1.   

Abstract

AIM: To quantify the numbers and extent of movements off sheep and cattle farms in New Zealand, in order to construct more realistic simulation models to investigate how infectious diseases such as foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) might spread.
METHODS: Farmers from 500 randomly selected farms, comprising 100 from each of the following sectors, viz beef, dairy, grazing/dairy heifer rearing, sheep, and mixed sheep and beef, were asked to fill in diaries in which they recorded the movements of all animals, products, people, vehicles and equipment coming on to or leaving their farms during two separate 3-week periods, representing relatively 'busy' and 'quiet' times of the year with respect to livestock movements. Where possible, the destination of each movement was identified and geo-coded, to allow the distance travelled to be calculated. Each movement was then classified according to the risk of transfer of FMD virus (FMDV), should the disease have been present on the study farm at the time of the movement. The data were then analysed to establish movement frequencies and distributions of distances travelled, by the different pastoral livestock sectors.
RESULTS: Two hundred and seventeen farmers returned one or more diaries. One hundred and ninety-three farmers completed a Busy-period diary, recording a total of 12,052 movements off their farms, a crude average of 62.4 per 3-week period, or 2.97 per day. Of these, 4.0% involved the transport of livestock, equating to 0.12 livestock consignments per day. In contrast, 186 Quiet-period diaries were returned, recording a total of 10,885 movements off, representing a crude average of 58.5 during the 3-week period, or 2.78 per day. Of these, 2.1% involved livestock, equating to 0.06 livestock consignments per day. The mean and median distances travelled during the Busy periods were 30.9 km and 13.1 km, respectively (range 0-1,167 km). In comparison, the mean and median distances travelled during Quiet periods were 41.3 and 14 km, respectively (range 0.4-1,203 km).
CONCLUSIONS: People, vehicles, livestock and other items can travel off pastoral livestock farms in New Zealand to other farms either directly or via saleyards over extensive distances. This has implications for the potential spread of infectious diseases such as FMD. Movement parameters intended for use in the InterSpread Plus inter-farm simulation model of FMD were established, which will facilitate the prediction of likely spread and efficacy of controls in the unlikely event of a real-life outbreak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16044181     DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2005.36550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Vet J        ISSN: 0048-0169            Impact factor:   1.628


  8 in total

1.  Contribution of company affiliation and social contacts to risk estimates of between-farm transmission of avian influenza.

Authors:  Jessica H Leibler; Marco Carone; Ellen K Silbergeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Potential for epidemic take-off from the primary outbreak farm via livestock movements.

Authors:  Michael J Tildesley; Victoriya V Volkova; Mark Ej Woolhouse
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Spatiotemporal Variation in Distance Dependent Animal Movement Contacts: One Size Doesn't Fit All.

Authors:  Peter Brommesson; Uno Wennergren; Tom Lindström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Potential Role of Direct and Indirect Contacts on Infection Spread in Dairy Farm Networks.

Authors:  Gianluigi Rossi; Giulio A De Leo; Stefano Pongolini; Silvano Natalini; Luca Zarenghi; Matteo Ricchi; Luca Bolzoni
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Modelling farm-to-farm disease transmission through personnel movements: from visits to contacts, and back.

Authors:  Gianluigi Rossi; Rebecca L Smith; Stefano Pongolini; Luca Bolzoni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A bayesian approach for modeling cattle movements in the United States: scaling up a partially observed network.

Authors:  Tom Lindström; Daniel A Grear; Michael Buhnerkempe; Colleen T Webb; Ryan S Miller; Katie Portacci; Uno Wennergren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A survey of visitors on Swedish livestock farms with reference to the spread of animal diseases.

Authors:  Maria Nöremark; Jenny Frössling; Susanna Sternberg Lewerin
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Development of a transboundary model of livestock disease in Europe.

Authors:  Richard Bradhurst; Graeme Garner; Márk Hóvári; Maria de la Puente; Koen Mintiens; Shankar Yadav; Tiziano Federici; Ian Kopacka; Simon Stockreiter; Ivanka Kuzmanova; Samuil Paunov; Vladimir Cacinovic; Martina Rubin; Jusztina Szilágyi; Zsófia Szepesiné Kókány; Annalisa Santi; Marco Sordilli; Laura Sighinas; Mihaela Spiridon; Marko Potocnik; Keith Sumption
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.521

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.