Literature DB >> 16043700

Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions.

Julian Mintseris1, Zhiping Weng.   

Abstract

Recent analyses of high-throughput protein interaction data coupled with large-scale investigations of evolutionary properties of interaction networks have left some unanswered questions. To what extent do protein interactions act as constraints during evolution of the protein sequence? How does the type of interaction, specifically transient or obligate, play into these constraints? Are the mutations in the binding site of an interacting protein correlated with mutations in the binding site of its partner? We address these and other questions by relying on a carefully curated dataset of protein complex structures. Results point to the importance of distinguishing between transient and obligate interactions. We conclude that residues in the interfaces of obligate complexes tend to evolve at a relatively slower rate, allowing them to coevolve with their interacting partners. In contrast, the plasticity inherent in transient interactions leads to an increased rate of substitution for the interface residues and leaves little or no evidence of correlated mutations across the interface.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16043700      PMCID: PMC1182425          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502667102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  32 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners.

Authors:  C S Goh; A A Bogan; M Joachimiak; D Walther; F E Cohen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06-02       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Identification of protein oligomerization states by analysis of interface conservation.

Authors:  A H Elcock; J A McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Protein-protein interfaces: analysis of amino acid conservation in homodimers.

Authors:  W S Valdar; J M Thornton
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-01-01

5.  Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction.

Authors:  F Pazos; A Valencia
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2001-09

Review 6.  The many faces of Ras: recognition of small GTP-binding proteins.

Authors:  K D Corbett; T Alber
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 13.807

7.  Co-evolutionary analysis reveals insights into protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Chern-Sing Goh; Fred E Cohen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Information-theoretic dissection of pairwise contact potentials.

Authors:  Melissa S Cline; Kevin Karplus; Richard H Lathrop; Temple F Smith; Robert G Rogers; David Haussler
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-10-01

9.  Estimation of the number of amino acid substitutions per site when the substitution rate varies among sites.

Authors:  N V Grishin
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network.

Authors:  Hunter B Fraser; Aaron E Hirsh; Lars M Steinmetz; Curt Scharfe; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  137 in total

1.  Evolution and functional diversification of the small heat shock protein/α-crystallin family in higher plants.

Authors:  Hernán Gabriel Bondino; Estela Marta Valle; Arjen Ten Have
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Accelerated evolution and coevolution drove the evolutionary history of AGPase sub-units during angiosperm radiation.

Authors:  Jonathan Corbi; Julien Y Dutheil; Catherine Damerval; Maud I Tenaillon; Domenica Manicacci
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0.

Authors:  Howook Hwang; Thom Vreven; Joël Janin; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-15

4.  Weak conservation of structural features in the interfaces of homologous transient protein-protein complexes.

Authors:  Govindarajan Sudha; Prashant Singh; Lakshmipuram S Swapna; Narayanaswamy Srinivasan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Protein interaction networks in plants.

Authors:  Joachim F Uhrig
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Structural similarity enhances interaction propensity of proteins.

Authors:  D B Lukatsky; B E Shakhnovich; J Mintseris; E I Shakhnovich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Specificity in protein interactions and its relationship with sequence diversity and coevolution.

Authors:  Luke Hakes; Simon C Lovell; Stephen G Oliver; David L Robertson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  High-confidence prediction of global interactomes based on genome-wide coevolutionary networks.

Authors:  David Juan; Florencio Pazos; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Structural mapping of protein interactions reveals differences in evolutionary pressures correlated to mRNA level and protein abundance.

Authors:  Matt Eames; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Posttranslational regulation impacts the fate of duplicated genes.

Authors:  Grigoris D Amoutzias; Ying He; Jonathan Gordon; Dimitris Mossialos; Stephen G Oliver; Yves Van de Peer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.