Literature DB >> 26311309

Weak conservation of structural features in the interfaces of homologous transient protein-protein complexes.

Govindarajan Sudha1, Prashant Singh1, Lakshmipuram S Swapna1, Narayanaswamy Srinivasan1.   

Abstract

Residue types at the interface of protein-protein complexes (PPCs) are known to be reasonably well conserved. However, we show, using a dataset of known 3-D structures of homologous transient PPCs, that the 3-D location of interfacial residues and their interaction patterns are only moderately and poorly conserved, respectively. Another surprising observation is that a residue at the interface that is conserved is not necessarily in the interface in the homolog. Such differences in homologous complexes are manifested by substitution of the residues that are spatially proximal to the conserved residue and structural differences at the interfaces as well as differences in spatial orientations of the interacting proteins. Conservation of interface location and the interaction pattern at the core of the interfaces is higher than at the periphery of the interface patch. Extents of variability of various structural features reported here for homologous transient PPCs are higher than the variation in homologous permanent homomers. Our findings suggest that straightforward extrapolation of interfacial nature and inter-residue interaction patterns from template to target could lead to serious errors in the modeled complex structure. Understanding the evolution of interfaces provides insights to improve comparative modeling of PPC structures.
© 2015 The Protein Society.

Keywords:  evolution of protein complexes; interfaces of protein complexes; protein-protein interactions; structure of protein complexes; transient protein complexes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26311309      PMCID: PMC4622218          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  122 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Structural basis for the specificity of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases.

Authors:  S C Johnston; S M Riddle; R E Cohen; C P Hill
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  The Rac-RhoGDI complex and the structural basis for the regulation of Rho proteins by RhoGDI.

Authors:  K Scheffzek; I Stephan; O N Jensen; D Illenberger; P Gierschik
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-02

4.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Irene M A Nooren; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Crystallographic refinement by incorporation of molecular dynamics: thermostable serine protease thermitase complexed with eglin c.

Authors:  P Gros; M Fujinaga; B W Dijkstra; K H Kalk; W G Hol
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  1989-10-01

6.  Crystal structure of an electron-transfer complex between methylamine dehydrogenase and amicyanin.

Authors:  L Chen; R Durley; B J Poliks; K Hamada; Z Chen; F S Mathews; V L Davidson; Y Satow; E Huizinga; F M Vellieux
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1992-06-02       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 7.  Principles of protein-protein interactions: what are the preferred ways for proteins to interact?

Authors:  Ozlem Keskin; Attila Gursoy; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Protein-protein alternative binding modes do not overlap.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Structural basis by which alternative splicing confers specificity in fibroblast growth factor receptors.

Authors:  Brian K Yeh; Makoto Igarashi; Anna V Eliseenkova; Alexander N Plotnikov; Ifat Sher; Dina Ron; Stuart A Aaronson; Moosa Mohammadi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Structural plasticity of eph receptor A4 facilitates cross-class ephrin signaling.

Authors:  Thomas A Bowden; A Radu Aricescu; Joanne E Nettleship; Christian Siebold; Nahid Rahman-Huq; Raymond J Owens; David I Stuart; E Yvonne Jones
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.006

View more
  2 in total

1.  PDB-wide identification of biological assemblies from conserved quaternary structure geometry.

Authors:  Sucharita Dey; David W Ritchie; Emmanuel D Levy
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Systematic domain-based aggregation of protein structures highlights DNA-, RNA- and other ligand-binding positions.

Authors:  Shilpa Nadimpalli Kobren; Mona Singh
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.