Literature DB >> 16043439

Phenotypic plasticity of growth trajectory and ontogenic allometry in response to density for eucalyptus hybrid clones and families.

Jean-Marc Bouvet1, Philippe Vigneron, Aubin Saya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: and Aims Response to density is a crucial aspect of the ecology of trees in forests and plantations. Few studies have investigated the genetics of plasticity in response to density for growth traits such as height and circumference through development.
METHODS: Two experiments were carried out in the field, the first with full-sib families of Eucalyptus urophylla x E. grandis hybrids, and the second with clones of E. tereticornis x E. grandis hybrids planted across a range of densities (625, 1111 and 2500 trees ha-1). Height, circumference and stem taper were measured through development in both experiments. Variance components were estimated and a repeated measure approach for plasticity and three different methods were used to compare the variance-covariance matrix across densities. KEY
RESULTS: Genetic variance was significantly different from zero but the density x genotype interaction was significant only for clone experiments at the adult stage. Significant plasticity for three traits in both experiments was found. In the clone experiments, a significant clone x time x density interaction was found, suggesting that plasticity for growth and stem form is under genetic control. In both experiments, density did not affect environmental correlation, which remained high throughout tree development. The impact of density on genetic correlation was marked in the clone experiment, with a reduced value at lower density, but was not observed in the family trial. The differences between clones and family are mainly explained by the distribution of genetic variation within and among genotypes.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that plasticity for growth traits and form of tropical Eucalyptus species is under genetic control and that the environment changes genetic co-variation through ontogeny. The findings confirm that a tree population with a narrow genetic basis (represented by clones) is sensitive to a changing environment, whereas a population with a broader genetic basis (full-sib family here) exhibits a more stable reaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16043439      PMCID: PMC4247045          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  10 in total

1.  Comparing G matrices: a MANOVA approach.

Authors:  Derek Roff
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Density-induced plant size reduction and size inequalities in ethylene-sensing and ethylene-insensitive tobacco.

Authors:  R Pierik; L A C J Voesenek; H de Kroon; E J W Visser
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.081

3.  Nonparametric confidence interval estimators for heritability and expected selection response.

Authors:  S J Knapp; W C Bridges; M H Yang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Heritabilities and genetic correlations for estimated growth curve parameters in maritime pine.

Authors:  F Danjon
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  The expression of additive and nonadditive genetic variation under stress.

Authors:  M W Blows; M B Sokolowski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Ontogenetic phenotypic plasticity during the reproductive phase in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae).

Authors:  M Pigliucci
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  Hydraulic architecture and the evolution of shoot allometry in contrasting climates.

Authors:  Katherine A Preston; David D Ackerly
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  Allometry and development in herbaceous plants: functional responses of meristem allocation to light and nutrient availability.

Authors:  Stephen P Bonser; Lonnie W Aarssen
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  Genetic control of macro-and micro-environmental sensitivities in Populus.

Authors:  R L Wu
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Comparative studies of evolutionary responses to light environments in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Massimo Pigliucci; Heidi Pollard; Mitchell B Cruzan
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-12-30       Impact factor: 3.926

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  The expression of light-related leaf functional traits depends on the location of individual leaves within the crown of isolated Olea europaea trees.

Authors:  Adrián G Escribano-Rocafort; Agustina B Ventre-Lespiaucq; Carlos Granado-Yela; Rafael Rubio de Casas; Juan A Delgado; Luis Balaguer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Field patterns of leaf plasticity in adults of the long-lived evergreen Quercus coccifera.

Authors:  Rafael Rubio De Casas; Pablo Vargas; Esther Pérez-Corona; Esteban Manrique; José Ramón Quintana; Carlos García-Verdugo; Luis Balaguer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-06-17       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Plasticity in Vegetative Growth over Contrasted Growing Sites of an F1 Olive Tree Progeny during Its Juvenile Phase.

Authors:  Inès Ben Sadok; Sebastien Martinez; Nathalie Moutier; Gilbert Garcia; Lorenzo Leon; Angelina Belaj; Raúl De La Rosa; Bouchaib Khadari; Evelyne Costes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Phenotypic plasticity of early and late successional forbs in response to shifts in resources.

Authors:  Yingxin Huang; Xueyong Zhao; Daowei Zhou; Hongxiang Zhang; Wei Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Plasticity of primary and secondary growth dynamics in Eucalyptus hybrids: a quantitative genetics and QTL mapping perspective.

Authors:  Jérôme Bartholomé; Frédéric Salmon; Philippe Vigneron; Jean-Marc Bouvet; Christophe Plomion; Jean-Marc Gion
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 4.215

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.