Literature DB >> 17246496

Nonparametric confidence interval estimators for heritability and expected selection response.

S J Knapp1, W C Bridges, M H Yang.   

Abstract

Statistical methods have not been described for comparing estimates of family-mean heritability (H) or expected selection response (R), nor have consistently valid methods been described for estimating R intervals. Nonparametric methods, e.g., delete-one jackknifing, may be used to estimate variances, intervals, and hypothesis test statistics in estimation problems where parametric methods are unsuitable, nonrobust, or undefinable. Our objective was to evaluate normal-approximation jackknife interval estimators for H and R using Monte Carlo simulation. Simulations were done using normally distributed within-family effects and normally, uniformly, and exponentially distributed between-family effects. Realized coverage probabilities for jackknife interval (2) and parametric interval (5) for H were not significantly different from stated probabilities when between-family effects were normally distributed. Coverages for jackknife intervals (3) and (4) for R were not significantly different from stated coverages when between-family effects were normally distributed. Coverages for interval (3) for R were occasionally significantly less than stated when between-family effects were uniformly or exponentially distributed. Coverages for interval (2) for H were occasionally significantly less than stated when between-family effects were exponentially distributed. Thus, intervals (3) and (4) for R and (2) for H were robust. Means of analysis of variance estimates of R were often significantly less than parametric values when the number of families evaluated was 60 or less. Means of analysis of variance estimates of H were consistently significantly less than parametric values. Means of jackknife estimates of H calculated from log transformed point estimates and R calculated from untransformed or log transformed point estimates were not significantly different from parametric values. Thus, jackknife estimators of H and R were unbiased. Delete-one jackknifing is a robust, versatile, and effective statistical method when applied to estimation problems involving variance functions. Jackknifing is especially valuable in hypothesis test estimation problems where the objective is comparing estimates from different populations.

Year:  1989        PMID: 17246496      PMCID: PMC1203673     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  1 in total

1.  Expected selection differentials for directional selection.

Authors:  P M Burrows
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 2.571

  1 in total
  17 in total

1.  Spontaneous mutational correlations for life-history, morphological and behavioral characters in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Suzanne Estes; Beverly C Ajie; Michael Lynch; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-04-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Bias and precision in QST estimates: problems and some solutions.

Authors:  R B O'Hara; J Merilä
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The adaptive potential of a plant pathogenic fungus, Rhizoctonia solani AG-3, under heat and fungicide stress.

Authors:  Yvonne Willi; Aline Frank; Renate Heinzelmann; Andrea Kälin; Lena Spalinger; Paulo C Ceresini
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Sampling distributions, biases, variances, and confidence intervals for genetic correlations.

Authors:  B H Liu; S J Knapp; D Birkes
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Application of approximate variances of variance components and their ratios in genetic tests.

Authors:  M J Dieters; T L White; R C Littell; G R Hodge
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Genetic variation and co-variation for fitness between intra-population and inter-population backgrounds in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  D W Drury; M J Wade
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Comparing mutational and standing genetic variability for fitness and size in Caenorhabditis briggsae and C. elegans.

Authors:  Matthew P Salomon; Dejerianne Ostrow; Naomi Phillips; Dustin Blanton; Whitney Bour; Thomas E Keller; Laura Levy; Thamar Sylvestre; Ambuj Upadhyay; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Few genetic and environmental correlations between life history and stress resistance traits affect adaptation to fluctuating thermal regimes.

Authors:  T Manenti; J G Sørensen; N N Moghadam; V Loeschcke
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  The distribution of genetic parameter estimates and confidence intervals from small disconnected diallels.

Authors:  Fikret Isik; Dennis D Boos; Bailian Li
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Bias and evolution of the mutationally accessible phenotypic space in a developmental system.

Authors:  Christian Braendle; Charles F Baer; Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.