Literature DB >> 16042501

The potential adverse health effects of dental amalgam.

Amy M Brownawell1, Stanley Berent, Robert L Brent, James V Bruckner, John Doull, Eric M Gershwin, Ronald D Hood, Genevieve M Matanoski, Raphael Rubin, Bernard Weiss, Meryl H Karol.   

Abstract

There is significant public concern about the potential health effects of exposure to mercury vapour (Hg(0)) released from dental amalgam restorations. The purpose of this article is to provide information about the toxicokinetics of Hg(0), evaluate the findings from the recent scientific and medical literature, and identify research gaps that when filled may definitively support or refute the hypothesis that dental amalgam causes adverse health effects. Dental amalgam is a widely used restorative dental material that was introduced over 150 years ago. Most standard dental amalgam formulations contain approximately 50% elemental mercury. Experimental evidence consistently demonstrates that Hg(0) is released from dental amalgam restorations and is absorbed by the human body. Numerous studies report positive correlations between the number of dental amalgam restorations or surfaces and urine mercury concentrations in non-occupationally exposed individuals. Although of public concern, it is currently unclear what adverse health effects are caused by the levels of Hg(0) released from this restoration material. Historically, studies of occupationally exposed individuals have provided consistent information about the relationship between exposure to Hg(0) and adverse effects reflecting both nervous system and renal dysfunction. Workers are usually exposed to substantially higher Hg(0) levels than individuals with dental amalgam restorations and are typically exposed 8 hours per day for 20-30 years, whereas persons with dental amalgam restorations are exposed 24 hours per day over some portion of a lifetime. This review has uncovered no convincing evidence pointing to any adverse health effects that are attributable to dental amalgam restorations besides hypersensitivity in some individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16042501     DOI: 10.2165/00139709-200524010-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Rev        ISSN: 1176-2551


  21 in total

1.  Quantification of Hg excretion and distribution in biological samples of mercury-dental-amalgam users and its correlation with biological variables.

Authors:  Nayab Gul; Sardar Khan; Abbas Khan; Javed Nawab; Isha Shamshad; Xinwei Yu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Biomonitoring of cadmium, chromium, nickel and arsenic in general population living near mining and active industrial areas in Southern Tunisia.

Authors:  Rim Khlifi; Pablo Olmedo; Fernando Gil; Molka Feki-Tounsi; Bouthaina Hammami; Ahmed Rebai; Amel Hamza-Chaffai
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 5 years in children exposed prenatally to maternal dental amalgam: the Seychelles Child Development Nutrition Study.

Authors:  Gene E Watson; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Tanzy M T Love; Emeir M McSorley; Maxine P Bonham; Maria S Mulhern; Alison J Yeates; Philip W Davidson; Conrad F Shamlaye; J J Strain; Sally W Thurston; Donald Harrington; Grazyna Zareba; Julie M W Wallace; Gary J Myers
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 3.763

4.  Prenatal exposure to dental amalgam in the Seychelles Child Development Nutrition Study: associations with neurodevelopmental outcomes at 9 and 30 months.

Authors:  Gene E Watson; Katie Evans; Sally W Thurston; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Julie M W Wallace; Emeir M McSorley; Maxine P Bonham; Maria S Mulhern; Alison J McAfee; Philip W Davidson; Conrad F Shamlaye; J J Strain; Tanzy Love; Grazyna Zareba; Gary J Myers
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.294

5.  Organic and inorganic mercury in neonatal rat brain after prenatal exposure to methylmercury and mercury vapor.

Authors:  Hiromi Ishitobi; Sander Stern; Sally W Thurston; Grazyna Zareba; Margaret Langdon; Robert Gelein; Bernard Weiss
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Exposures of dental professionals to elemental mercury and methylmercury.

Authors:  Jaclyn M Goodrich; Hwai-Nan Chou; Stephen E Gruninger; Alfred Franzblau; Niladri Basu
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  Biomarkers of kidney integrity in children and adolescents with dental amalgam mercury exposure: findings from the Casa Pia children's amalgam trial.

Authors:  James S Woods; Michael D Martin; Brian G Leroux; Timothy A DeRouen; Mario F Bernardo; Henrique S Luis; Jorge G Leitão; John V Kushleika; Tessa C Rue; Anna M Korpak
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Bacterial Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to Dental Material Surfaces.

Authors:  Mirjam Kozmos; Petra Virant; Franc Rojko; Anže Abram; Rebeka Rudolf; Peter Raspor; Anamarija Zore; Klemen Bohinc
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  The dental amalgam toxicity fear: a myth or actuality.

Authors:  Monika Rathore; Archana Singh; Vandana A Pant
Journal:  Toxicol Int       Date:  2012-05

10.  Dental amalgam restorations and children's neuropsychological function: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.

Authors:  David C Bellinger; David Daniel; Felicia Trachtenberg; Mary Tavares; Sonja McKinlay
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.