Literature DB >> 27464660

Quantification of Hg excretion and distribution in biological samples of mercury-dental-amalgam users and its correlation with biological variables.

Nayab Gul1, Sardar Khan2,3, Abbas Khan4, Javed Nawab1,5, Isha Shamshad1,6, Xinwei Yu7.   

Abstract

This is the first study conducted to quantify the excretion and distribution of mercury (Hg) with time (days) in the biological samples collected from Hg dental amalgam users (MDA). The individuals, with Hg-based dental filling were selected, and their biological samples (red blood cells (RBCs), plasma, urine, hair, and nails) were collected on first, third, and 12th day of fillings. The concentrations of Hg observed in the biological samples of MDA were also correlated with the biological variables such as age, weight, restoration, fish consumption, number, and surface area of fillings. The concentrations of Hg in the biological samples of MDA were found 6-8 times higher than the non-amalgam users (control). The concentrations of Hg in the RBCs (4.39 μg/L), plasma (3.02 μg/L), and urine (22.5 μg/L) on first day of filling were found comparatively higher than the concentrations observed on third day (2.15, 1.46, and 12.3 μg/L for RBCs, plasma, urine, respectively) and 12th day (3.05, 2.5, 9.12 μg/L for RBCs, plasma, urine, respectively), while Hg concentrations were found lower in the hair and nails on third day of fillings (1.53 μg/g for hair and 2.35 μg/g for nails) as compared to the 12th day (2.95 μg/g for hair and 3.5 μg/g for nails). The correlations were found significant (p ˂ 0.05) between Hg concentrations in the biological samples of MDA and biological variables (the number of restoration, fish consumption, number, and surface area of fillings), while no significant (p ˃ 0.05) correlations were observed for Hg concentrations in the biological samples with age and weight of MDA. These observations unveil the fact that the use of Hg-based dental filling is the undesirable exposure to Hg which should be replaced by composite (a safer filling material).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological variables; Dental amalgam users; Hair; Mercury; Nails; Plasma; Red blood cells; Urine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27464660     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7266-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  32 in total

1.  Comments on the article "the toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds" by Clarkson and Magos (2006).

Authors:  Joachim Mutter; Johannes Naumann; Corina Guethlin
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  Evaluation of environmental and occupational exposure to mercury among Iranian dentists.

Authors:  Ghasem Zolfaghari; Abbas Esmaili-Sari; Seyed Mahmoud Ghasempouri; Soghrat Faghihzadeh
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  A dental look at the autistic patient through orofacial pain.

Authors:  Fares Zeidán-Chuliá; Ulvi K Gursoy; Eija Könönen; Carmem Gottfried
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  Mercury (Hg) burden in children: the impact of dental amalgam.

Authors:  Iman Al-Saleh; Al Anoud Al-Sedairi
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Dental "silver" tooth fillings: a source of mercury exposure revealed by whole-body image scan and tissue analysis.

Authors:  L J Hahn; R Kloiber; M J Vimy; Y Takahashi; F L Lorscheider
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Biomarkers of kidney integrity in children and adolescents with dental amalgam mercury exposure: findings from the Casa Pia children's amalgam trial.

Authors:  James S Woods; Michael D Martin; Brian G Leroux; Timothy A DeRouen; Mario F Bernardo; Henrique S Luis; Jorge G Leitão; John V Kushleika; Tessa C Rue; Anna M Korpak
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Biological monitoring involving children exposed to mercury from a barometer in a private residence.

Authors:  Paul T J Scheepers; Marieke van Ballegooij-Gevers; Henk Jans
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 8.  Human exposure and health effects of inorganic and elemental mercury.

Authors:  Jung-Duck Park; Wei Zheng
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2012-11-29

9.  Is dental amalgam safe for humans? The opinion of the scientific committee of the European Commission.

Authors:  Joachim Mutter
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.646

10.  Inter-individual variations of human mercury exposure biomarkers: a cross-sectional assessment.

Authors:  Marika Berglund; Birger Lind; Karolin Ask Björnberg; Brita Palm; Osten Einarsson; Marie Vahter
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 5.984

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prenatal exposure to mercury in relation to infant infections and respiratory symptoms in the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

Authors:  Rebecca T Emeny; Susan A Korrick; Zhigang Li; Kari Nadeau; Juliette Madan; Brian Jackson; Emily Baker; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 6.498

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.