Literature DB >> 16041583

Reciprocal translocations: a trap for cytogenetists?

Roberto Ciccone1, Roberto Giorda, Giuliana Gregato, Renzo Guerrini, Sabrina Giglio, Romeo Carrozzo, Maria Clara Bonaglia, Emanuela Priolo, Carmelo Laganà, Romano Tenconi, Mariano Rocchi, Tiziano Pramparo, Orsetta Zuffardi, Elena Rossi.   

Abstract

We report four cases of subjects with phenotypic abnormalities and mental retardation associated with apparently balanced translocations, two inherited and two de novo, which showed, by molecular analysis, a hidden complexity. All the cases have been analyzed with different molecular techniques, including array-CGH, and in two of them the translocation breakpoints have been defined at the level of base pairs via studies in somatic hybrids containing single derivative chromosomes. We demonstrated that all the translocations were in fact complex rearrangements and that an imbalance was present in three of them, thus accounting for the phenotypic abnormalities. In one case, a Prader-Willi subject, we were not able to determine the molecular cause of his phenotype. This study, while confirming previous data showing unexpected complexity in translocations, further underscores the need for molecular investigations before taking for granted an apparently simple cytogenetic interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16041583     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-005-1324-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  31 in total

1.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization characterization of apparently balanced translocation reveals cryptic complex chromosomal rearrangements with unexpected level of complexity.

Authors:  Philippos C Patsalis; Paola Evangelidou; Spyros Charalambous; Carolina Sismani
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Balanced translocation 46,XY,t(2;15)(q37.2;q11.2) associated with atypical Prader-Willi syndrome.

Authors:  J M Conroy; T A Grebe; L A Becker; K Tsuchiya; R D Nicholls; K Buiting; B Horsthemke; S B Cassidy; S Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints.

Authors:  D Warburton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Chromosomal abnormalities in mendelian disorders.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-08-07       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Genome scanning with array CGH delineates regional alterations in mouse islet carcinomas.

Authors:  G Hodgson; J H Hager; S Volik; S Hariono; M Wernick; D Moore; N Nowak; D G Albertson; D Pinkel; C Collins; D Hanahan; J W Gray
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Automated screening for genomic imbalances using matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Swen Wessendorf; Björn Fritz; Gunnar Wrobel; Michelle Nessling; Stefan Lampel; Daniel Göettel; Manfred Küepper; Stefan Joos; Ton Hopman; Felix Kokocinski; Hartmut Döhner; Martin Bentz; Carsten Schwäenen; Peter Lichter
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.662

7.  Somatic mosaicism in patients with Angelman syndrome and an imprinting defect.

Authors:  Hülya Nazlican; Michael Zeschnigk; Uwe Claussen; Susanne Michel; Stefan Boehringer; Gabriele Gillessen-Kaesbach; Karin Buiting; Bernhard Horsthemke
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  A cryptic deletion of 2q35 including part of the PAX3 gene detected by breakpoint mapping in a child with autism and a de novo 2;8 translocation.

Authors:  I Borg; M Squire; C Menzel; K Stout; D Morgan; L Willatt; P C M O'Brien; M A Ferguson-Smith; H H Ropers; N Tommerup; V M Kalscheuer; D R Sargan
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Prader-Willi syndrome: consensus diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  V A Holm; S B Cassidy; M G Butler; J M Hanchett; L R Greenswag; B Y Whitman; F Greenberg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  De novo apparently balanced complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) involving chromosomes 4, 18, and 21 in a girl with mental retardation: report and review.

Authors:  J R Batanian; M S Eswara
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1998-06-16
View more
  17 in total

1.  De novo deletions and duplications detected by array CGH: a study of parental origin in relation to mechanisms of formation and size of imbalance.

Authors:  Charlene Sibbons; Joan K Morris; John A Crolla; Patricia A Jacobs; N Simon Thomas
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Ultra-high resolution array painting facilitates breakpoint sequencing.

Authors:  S M Gribble; D Kalaitzopoulos; D C Burford; E Prigmore; R R Selzer; B L Ng; N S W Matthews; K M Porter; R Curley; S J Lindsay; J Baptista; T A Richmond; N P Carter
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Inversion polymorphisms and non-contiguous terminal deletions: the cause and the (unpredicted) effect of our genome architecture.

Authors:  R Ciccone; T Mattina; R Giorda; M C Bonaglia; M Rocchi; T Pramparo; O Zuffardi
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Cytogenetically balanced translocations are associated with focal copy number alterations.

Authors:  Spencer K Watson; Ronald J deLeeuw; Doug E Horsman; Jeremy A Squire; Wan L Lam
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  13q Deletion and central nervous system anomalies: further insights from karyotype-phenotype analyses of 14 patients.

Authors:  Lucia Ballarati; Elena Rossi; Maria Teresa Bonati; Stefania Gimelli; Paola Maraschio; Palma Finelli; Sabrina Giglio; Elisabetta Lapi; Maria Francesca Bedeschi; Silvana Guerneri; Giulia Arrigo; Maria Grazia Patricelli; Teresa Mattina; Oriana Guzzardi; Vanna Pecile; Adalgisa Police; Gioacchino Scarano; Lidia Larizza; Orsetta Zuffardi; Daniela Giardino
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  A mouse translocation associated with Caspr5-2 disruption and perinatal lethality.

Authors:  Dieter Weichenhan; Walther Traut; Christina Göngrich; Heinz Himmelbauer; Lüder Busch; Hannah Monyer; Heinz Winking
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 2.957

7.  Breakpoint mapping and array CGH in translocations: comparison of a phenotypically normal and an abnormal cohort.

Authors:  Julia Baptista; Catherine Mercer; Elena Prigmore; Susan M Gribble; Nigel P Carter; Viv Maloney; N Simon Thomas; Patricia A Jacobs; John A Crolla
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Genetic Approach to Diagnosis of Intellectual Disability.

Authors:  Ratna Dua Puri; Moni Tuteja; I C Verma
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 9.  What's new in karyotyping? The move towards array comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH).

Authors:  Thomy J L de Ravel; Koen Devriendt; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  A de novo 8.8-Mb deletion of 21q21.1-q21.3 in an autistic male with a complex rearrangement involving chromosomes 6, 10, and 21.

Authors:  Chad R Haldeman-Englert; Kimberly A Chapman; Hillary Kruger; Elizabeth A Geiger; Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Eric Rappaport; Elaine H Zackai; Nancy B Spinner; Tamim H Shaikh
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.