Literature DB >> 16041496

Genetic diversity and new therapeutic concepts.

Barkur S Shastry1.   

Abstract

The differences in medicinal drug responses among individuals had been known for quite some time. Some patients exhibit a life-threatening adverse reaction while others fail to show an expected therapeutic effect. Intermediate responses between the above two extreme cases are also known. In fact, it has been recently reported that approximately 100,000 deaths and more than 2 million hospitalizations annually in the United States are due to properly prescribed medications. This interindividual variability could be due in part to genetically determined characteristics of target genes or drug metabolizing enzymes. This has now been substantiated by a variety of studies. We know that "one size fits all" is not correct. Therefore, the application of pharmacogenetic concepts to clinical practice is an excellent goal in the postgenomic era. The successful completion of the human genome project provided necessary molecular tools, such as high-throughput SNP genotyping, HapMap, and microarray, that can be applied to develop proper therapeutic options for individuals. Recently, there have been considerable scientific, corporate, and policy interest in pharmacotherapy. However, identification of causal variations in a target gene is only a starting point, and the progress in this rapidly developing field is slower than expected. One major drawback could be due to the multigene determinant of drug response that requires a genome-wide screening. Additionally, application of pharmacogenetic knowledge into clinical practice requires a high level of accuracy, precision (risk/benefit ratio), and strict regulations. This is because the pharmacogenetic approach raises several ethical, moral, and legal questions. It is also necessary that both health professionals and the general public must be urgently educated. Despite these limitations, translation of pharmacogenomic data into clinical practice would certainly provide better opportunities to increase the safety and efficacy of medicine in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16041496     DOI: 10.1007/s10038-005-0264-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1434-5161            Impact factor:   3.172


  84 in total

1.  Identification and analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the gemcitabine pharmacologic pathway.

Authors:  A K Fukunaga; S Marsh; D J Murry; T D Hurley; H L McLeod
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 2.  Pharmacogenomics: bench to bedside.

Authors:  Richard Weinshilboum; Liewei Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 3.  Clinical and functional consequences of platelet membrane glycoprotein polymorphisms.

Authors:  Donald L Yee; Paul F Bray
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.180

Review 4.  Genetic contribution to variable human CYP3A-mediated metabolism.

Authors:  Jatinder K Lamba; Yvonne S Lin; Erin G Schuetz; Kenneth E Thummel
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2002-11-18       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Evaluation of the genetic component of variability in CYP3A4 activity: a repeated drug administration method.

Authors:  V Ozdemir; W Kalow; B K Tang; A D Paterson; S E Walker; L Endrenyi; A D Kashuba
Journal:  Pharmacogenetics       Date:  2000-07

6.  Evidence for a cardiac ion channel mutation underlying drug-induced QT prolongation and life-threatening arrhythmias.

Authors:  C Napolitano; P J Schwartz; A M Brown; E Ronchetti; L Bianchi; A Pinnavaia; G Acquaro; S G Priori
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-06

7.  Genotype and allele frequencies of C3435T polymorphism of the MDR1 gene in various Jewish populations of Israel.

Authors:  Olga Ostrovsky; Arnon Nagler; Michael Korostishevsky; Ephraim Gazit; Hanan Galski
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 8.  Pharmacogenetics of dopamine receptors and response to antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia--an update.

Authors:  Joachim Scharfetter
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 9.  Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and the efficacy and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  André B P van Kuilenburg
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 10.  Genetics of the variable expression of CYP3A in humans.

Authors:  Leszek Wojnowski
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.681

View more
  9 in total

1.  New take on comparative immunology: relevance to immunotherapy.

Authors:  Ena Wang; Adriana Albini; David F Stroncek; Francesco M Marincola
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 2.  Genetic diversity and medicinal drug response in eye care.

Authors:  Barkur S Shastry
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Assessment of systematic effects of methodological characteristics on candidate genetic associations.

Authors:  Badr Aljasir; John P A Ioannidis; Alex Yurkiewich; David Moher; Julian P T Higgins; Paul Arora; Julian Little
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Chronopharmaceutical drug delivery systems: Hurdles, hype or hope?

Authors:  Bi-Botti C Youan
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  GOG 8020/210: Risk stratification of lymph node metastasis, disease progression and survival using single nucleotide polymorphisms in endometrial cancer: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Brooks; David S Tritchler; Kathleen M Darcy; Heather A Lankes; Ritu Salani; Paul Sperduto; Saketh Guntupalli; Paul DiSilvestro; Joshua Kesterson; Alexander B Olawaiye; Katherine Moxley; Steven Waggoner; Alessandro Santin; Janet S Rader; Nora T Kizer; Premal H Thaker; Matthew A Powell; David G Mutch; Michael J Birrer; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Significant associations of mismatch repair gene polymorphisms with clinical outcome of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoqun Dong; Li Jiao; Yanan Li; Douglas B Evans; Huamin Wang; Kenneth R Hess; James L Abbruzzese; Donghui Li
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  SNPs in disease gene mapping, medicinal drug development and evolution.

Authors:  Barkur S Shastry
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  SPPS resins impact the PNA-syntheses' improvement.

Authors:  Rüdiger Pipkorn; Stephan Rawer; Manfred Wiessler; Waldemar Waldeck; Mario Koch; Hans Hermann Schrenk; Klaus Braun
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Finding multiple target optimal intervention in disease-related molecular network.

Authors:  Kun Yang; Hongjun Bai; Qi Ouyang; Luhua Lai; Chao Tang
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 11.429

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.