OBJECTIVE: To measure sexual function and quality of life (QOL) after rectal cancer treatment. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies on sexual function after rectal cancer treatment have focused on males and have not used validated instruments. METHODS: Patients undergoing curative rectal cancer surgery from 1980 to 2003 were administered a questionnaire, including the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) or International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and the EORTC QLQ-C30/CR-38. Multiple logistic regression was used to test associations of clinical factors with outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty-one women (81.0%) and 99 men (80.5%) returned the questionnaire; 32% of women and 50% of men are sexually active, compared with 61% and 91% preoperatively (P < 0.04); 29% of women and 45% of men reported that "surgery made their sexual lives worse." Mean (SD) FSFI and IIEF scores were 17.5 (11.9) and 29.3 (22.8). Specific sexual problems in women were libido 41%, arousal 29%, lubrication 56%, orgasm 35%, and dyspareunia 46%, and in men libido 47%, impotence 32%, partial impotence 52%, orgasm 41%, and ejaculation 43%. Both genders reported a negative body image. Patients seldom remembered discussing sexual risks preoperatively and seldom were treated for dysfunction. Current age (P < 0.001), surgical procedure (P = 0.003), and preoperative sexual activity (P = 0.001) were independently associated with current sexual activity. Gender (male, P = 0.014), surgical procedure (P = 0.005), and radiation therapy (P = 0.0001) were independently associated with the outcome "surgery made sexual life worse." Global QOL scores were high. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual problems after surgery for rectal cancer are common, multifactorial, inadequately discussed, and untreated. Therefore, sexual dysfunction should be discussed with rectal cancer patients, and efforts to prevent and treat it should be increased.
OBJECTIVE: To measure sexual function and quality of life (QOL) after rectal cancer treatment. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies on sexual function after rectal cancer treatment have focused on males and have not used validated instruments. METHODS:Patients undergoing curative rectal cancer surgery from 1980 to 2003 were administered a questionnaire, including the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) or International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and the EORTC QLQ-C30/CR-38. Multiple logistic regression was used to test associations of clinical factors with outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty-one women (81.0%) and 99 men (80.5%) returned the questionnaire; 32% of women and 50% of men are sexually active, compared with 61% and 91% preoperatively (P < 0.04); 29% of women and 45% of men reported that "surgery made their sexual lives worse." Mean (SD) FSFI and IIEF scores were 17.5 (11.9) and 29.3 (22.8). Specific sexual problems in women were libido 41%, arousal 29%, lubrication 56%, orgasm 35%, and dyspareunia 46%, and in men libido 47%, impotence 32%, partial impotence 52%, orgasm 41%, and ejaculation 43%. Both genders reported a negative body image. Patients seldom remembered discussing sexual risks preoperatively and seldom were treated for dysfunction. Current age (P < 0.001), surgical procedure (P = 0.003), and preoperative sexual activity (P = 0.001) were independently associated with current sexual activity. Gender (male, P = 0.014), surgical procedure (P = 0.005), and radiation therapy (P = 0.0001) were independently associated with the outcome "surgery made sexual life worse." Global QOL scores were high. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual problems after surgery for rectal cancer are common, multifactorial, inadequately discussed, and untreated. Therefore, sexual dysfunction should be discussed with rectal cancerpatients, and efforts to prevent and treat it should be increased.
Authors: Nam Kyu Kim; Tae Wan Aahn; Jea Kun Park; Kang Young Lee; Woong Hee Lee; Seung Kook Sohn; Jin Sik Min Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-03-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: P G Vaughan-Shaw; T Cheung; J S Knight; P H Nichols; S A Pilkington; A H Mirnezami Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Sean M Phelan; Joan M Griffin; George L Jackson; S Yousuf Zafar; Wendy Hellerstedt; Mandy Stahre; David Nelson; Leah L Zullig; Diana J Burgess; Michelle van Ryn Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Marco E Allaix; Alberto Arezzo; Simone Arolfo; Mario Caldart; Fabrizio Rebecchi; Mario Morino Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: J Segelman; C Buchli; A Svanström Röjvall; P Matthiessen; S Arver; M Bottai; M Ahlberg; R Jasuja; A Flöter-Rådestad; A Martling Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: J B Reese; P H Finan; J A Haythornthwaite; M Kadan; K R Regan; J M Herman; J Efron; L A Diaz; N S Azad Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-10-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jennifer Barsky Reese; Rebecca A Shelby; Francis J Keefe; Laura S Porter; Amy P Abernethy Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-09-24 Impact factor: 3.603