Literature DB >> 16040073

Strategies to assess systemic exposure of chemicals in subchronic/chronic diet and drinking water studies.

Shakil A Saghir1, Alan L Mendrala, Michael J Bartels, Sue J Day, Steve C Hansen, Jacob M Sushynski, James S Bus.   

Abstract

Strategies were developed for the estimation of systemically available daily doses of chemicals, diurnal variations in blood levels, and rough elimination rates in subchronic feeding/drinking water studies, utilizing a minimal number of blood samples. Systemic bioavailability of chemicals was determined by calculating area under the plasma concentration curve over 24 h (AUC-24 h) using complete sets of data (> or =5 data points) and also three, two, and one selected time points. The best predictions of AUC-24 h were made when three time points were used, corresponding to Cmax, a mid-morning sample, and C(min). These values were found to be 103 +/- 10% of the original AUC-24 h, with 13 out of 17 values ranging between 96 and 105% of the original. Calculation of AUC-24 h from two samples (Cmax and Cmin) or one mid-morning sample afforded slightly larger variations in the calculated AUC-24 h (69-136% of the actual). Following drinking water exposure, prediction of AUC-24 h using 3 time points (Cmax, mid-morning, and Cmin) was very close to actual values (80-100%) among mice, while values for rats were only 63% of the original due to less frequent drinking behavior of rats during the light cycle. Collection and analysis of 1-3 blood samples per dose may provide insight into dose-proportional or non-dose-proportional differences in systemic bioavailability, pointing towards saturation of absorption or elimination or some other phenomenon warranting further investigation. In addition, collection of the terminal blood samples from rats, which is usually conducted after 18 h of fasting, will be helpful in rough estimation of blood/plasma half-life of the compound. The amount of chemical(s) and/or metabolite(s) in excreta and their possible use as biomarkers in predicting the daily systemic exposure levels are also discussed. Determining these parameters in the early stages of testing will provide critical information to improve the appropriate design of other longer-term toxicity studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16040073     DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  8 in total

1.  FutureTox: building the road for 21st century toxicology and risk assessment practices.

Authors:  J Craig Rowlands; Miriam Sander; James S Bus
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Opportunities and challenges related to saturation of toxicokinetic processes: Implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Tan; Hugh A Barton; Alan Boobis; Rachel Brunner; Harvey Clewell; Rhian Cope; Jeffrey Dawson; Jeanne Domoradzki; Peter Egeghy; Pankaj Gulati; Brandall Ingle; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Kelly Lowe; Anna Lowit; Elizabeth Mendez; David Miller; Jeffrey Minucci; James Nguyen; Alicia Paini; Monique Perron; Katherine Phillips; Hua Qian; Tharacad Ramanarayanan; Fiona Sewell; Philip Villanueva; John Wambaugh; Michelle Embry
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  A Systematic Review of Carcinogenic Outcomes and Potential Mechanisms from Exposure to 2,4-D and MCPA in the Environment.

Authors:  Katherine von Stackelberg
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2013-02-26

Review 4.  Biomonitoring data for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in the United States and Canada: interpretation in a public health risk assessment context using Biomonitoring Equivalents.

Authors:  Lesa L Aylward; Marsha K Morgan; Tye E Arbuckle; Dana B Barr; Carol J Burns; Bruce H Alexander; Sean M Hays
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Development of screening tools for the interpretation of chemical biomonitoring data.

Authors:  Richard A Becker; Sean M Hays; Steven Robison; Lesa L Aylward
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2012-02-16

6.  An F1-extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study in Crl:CD(SD) rats with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid.

Authors:  Mary Sue Marty; Barbara H Neal; Carol L Zablotny; Barry L Yano; Amanda K Andrus; Michael R Woolhiser; Darrell R Boverhof; Shakil A Saghir; Adam W Perala; Julie K Passage; Marie A Lawson; James S Bus; James C Lamb; Larry Hammond
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Incorporating new technologies into toxicity testing and risk assessment: moving from 21st century vision to a data-driven framework.

Authors:  Russell S Thomas; Martin A Philbert; Scott S Auerbach; Barbara A Wetmore; Michael J Devito; Ila Cote; J Craig Rowlands; Maurice P Whelan; Sean M Hays; Melvin E Andersen; M E Bette Meek; Lawrence W Reiter; Jason C Lambert; Harvey J Clewell; Martin L Stephens; Q Jay Zhao; Scott C Wesselkamper; Lynn Flowers; Edward W Carney; Timothy P Pastoor; Dan D Petersen; Carole L Yauk; Andy Nong
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Life-stage-, sex-, and dose-dependent dietary toxicokinetics and relationship to toxicity of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in rats: implications for toxicity test dose selection, design, and interpretation.

Authors:  Shakil A Saghir; Mary S Marty; Carol L Zablotny; Julie K Passage; Adam W Perala; Barbara H Neal; Larry Hammond; James S Bus
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.849

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.