S E J Connor1, C Flis. 1. Neuroradiology Department, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK. steve.connor@kch.nhs.uk
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the contribution of routine review of submillimetric multiplanar reformats to the diagnosis of skull-base fractures. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed of 407 cases referred over a 6-month period for CT of the skull following cranial trauma. The reformatted 5-mm axial sections and subsequently the high-resolution multiplanar reformats (HRMPRs) were viewed on an ADW 4.1 workstation using bone windows and algorithm. All skull-base fractures and related features, recorded by the consensus of two radiologists, were classified as anatomically significant or non-significant on the basis of eight criteria. The clinical features of skull-base injury and any subsequent treatment were noted in all cases of skull-base fracture. RESULTS: HRMPRs detected 80 separate skull-base fractures in 36/407 cases. Of these 80 fractures, 57 were visible on 5-mm axial sections. In 8 of the 36 cases, the significant anatomical features were only evident on review of the HRMPRs. In 6 of the 36 cases, none of the skull-base fractures was visible on 5-mm sections, but these individuals had only minor associated clinical features and no therapeutic requirements. Review of HRMPRs could have been confined to patients with skull-base fractures, abnormal intracranial and extracranial air collections or opacified mastoid air cells revealed by 5-mm axial sections. This policy would have led to the detection of 79/80 (99%) of skull-base fractures and all significant anatomical features. CONCLUSION: The 5-mm axial sections demonstrated 71% of skull-base fractures and 78% of skull-base fractures with significant anatomical features, using HRMPRs as a gold standard. There were no significant clinical sequelae at short-term follow-up of those fractures only evident on HRMPRs.
AIM: To investigate the contribution of routine review of submillimetric multiplanar reformats to the diagnosis of skull-base fractures. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed of 407 cases referred over a 6-month period for CT of the skull following cranial trauma. The reformatted 5-mm axial sections and subsequently the high-resolution multiplanar reformats (HRMPRs) were viewed on an ADW 4.1 workstation using bone windows and algorithm. All skull-base fractures and related features, recorded by the consensus of two radiologists, were classified as anatomically significant or non-significant on the basis of eight criteria. The clinical features of skull-base injury and any subsequent treatment were noted in all cases of skull-base fracture. RESULTS: HRMPRs detected 80 separate skull-base fractures in 36/407 cases. Of these 80 fractures, 57 were visible on 5-mm axial sections. In 8 of the 36 cases, the significant anatomical features were only evident on review of the HRMPRs. In 6 of the 36 cases, none of the skull-base fractures was visible on 5-mm sections, but these individuals had only minor associated clinical features and no therapeutic requirements. Review of HRMPRs could have been confined to patients with skull-base fractures, abnormal intracranial and extracranial air collections or opacified mastoid air cells revealed by 5-mm axial sections. This policy would have led to the detection of 79/80 (99%) of skull-base fractures and all significant anatomical features. CONCLUSION: The 5-mm axial sections demonstrated 71% of skull-base fractures and 78% of skull-base fractures with significant anatomical features, using HRMPRs as a gold standard. There were no significant clinical sequelae at short-term follow-up of those fractures only evident on HRMPRs.
Authors: Helmut Ringl; Ruediger Schernthaner; Marcel O Philipp; Sylvia Metz-Schimmerl; Christian Czerny; Michael Weber; Christian Gäbler; Andrea Steiner-Ringl; Philipp Peloschek; Christian J Herold; Wolfgang Schima Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Eunice O Olabinri; Godwin I Ogbole; Amos O Adeleye; David M Dairo; Adefolarin O Malomo; Ayotunde O Ogunseyinde Journal: J Neurosci Rural Pract Date: 2015 Apr-Jun
Authors: Jyothish Sivanandapanicker; Milesh Nagar; Raja Kutty; B S Sunilkumar; Anilkumar Peethambaran; B P Rajmohan; Prasanth Asher; V P Shinihas; K Mohandas; Sourabh Jain; Saurabh Sharma Journal: J Neurosci Rural Pract Date: 2018 Jul-Sep
Authors: Ernst L Stille; Ilaria Viozzi; Mark Ter Laan; Frederick J A Meijer; Jurgen J Futterer; Maroeska M Rovers Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 2.804