Literature DB >> 16039498

Comparison of clear corneal phacoemulsification combined with 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy and standard 20-gauge vitrectomy for patients with cataract and vitreoretinal diseases.

Cheng-Jong Chang1, Yun-Hsiang Chang, Shang-Yi Chiang, Le-Tien Lin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare effectiveness and outcomes of clear corneal phacoemulsification combined with 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy and standard 20-gauge vitrectomy system for patients with clinically significant cataract and vitreoretinal diseases.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
METHODS: Clear corneal phacoemulsification combined with 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy was performed in the study group (15 eyes). Patients in the control group (15 eyes) had combined surgery with clear corneal phacoemulsification and the existing 20-gauge vitrectomy system, providing a comparison between 2 groups with regard to preoperative and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. The additional outcome measurements in both groups were duration of the surgical procedures, time to return to preoperative corneal clarity, time to achieve stable vision, and subjective ocular irritation postoperatively.
RESULTS: Postoperatively, BCVA improved in 12 eyes (80%) in the study group and in 11 eyes (73.3%) in the control group. Mean operative time for opening and closing the sclerotomy was significantly greater in the control group than in the study group. Time to return to preoperative corneal clarity and time to achieve stable vision showed no significant difference between the groups. Compared with the control group, postoperative ocular irritation in patients in the study group was considerably reduced.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined sutureless surgery needed shorter setup time for sclerotomy and caused less postoperative ocular irritation than combined surgery with 20-gauge vitrectomy. Therefore, this type of procedure would be a good option for selected cases with cataract and vitreoretinal diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16039498     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.11.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  15 in total

1.  25-gauge vs 20-gauge system for pars plana vitrectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Lukas Kellner; Barbara Wimpissinger; Ulrike Stolba; Werner Brannath; Susanne Binder
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  25G compared with 20G vitrectomy under Resight non-contact wide-angle lenses for Terson syndrome.

Authors:  Xinbang Mao; Zhipeng You
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Comparison of 25-gauge sutureless vitrectomy and 20-gauge vitrectomy in the treatment of posterior capsule opacification in pseudophakic children.

Authors:  Xiao-Ming Wu; Li-Xin Xie
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Surgical results of pars plana vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Chong-qing Yang; Jian-ping Tong; Ding-hua Lou
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for vitreoretinal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Zhi-Hua Zhang; Hai-Yun Liu; Barbara Wimpissinger; Teresio Avitabile; Xun Xu; Kun Liu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Comparative outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy in acute postoperative endophthalmitis with 25-gauge and 20-gauge techniques.

Authors:  Tugrul Altan; Ziya Kapran; Ilker Eser; Nur Acar; Yaprak Banu Unver; Serap Yurttaser
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Sutureless 25-gauge vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole repair.

Authors:  Stanislao Rizzo; Claudia Belting; Federica Cresti; Federica Genovesi-Ebert
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Differences between the combination of the 25-gauge vitrectomy with phacoemulsification versus 20-gauge vitrectomy and phacofragmentation.

Authors:  Pere Romero-Aroca; Matias Almena-Garcia; Marc Baget-Bernaldiz; Juan Fernández-Ballart; Isabel Méndez-Marin; Angel Bautista-Perez
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12-29

9.  Small gauge vitrectomy: Recent update.

Authors:  Sumeet Khanduja; Ashish Kakkar; Saptrishi Majumdar; Rajpal Vohra; Satpal Garg
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01

10.  The options to minimize the surgical trauma to treat ocular diabetic complications and to improve postoperative recovery and quality of life require an individualized approach.

Authors:  Wolfgang F Schrader; Tatjana Josifova
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 6.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.