Literature DB >> 22695935

Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for vitreoretinal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zhi-Hua Zhang1, Hai-Yun Liu, Barbara Wimpissinger, Teresio Avitabile, Xun Xu, Kun Liu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy is appealing to vitreoretinal surgeons around the world. However, its use versus 20-gauge vitreoretinal surgery is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the safety and functional outcomes of transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for vitreoretinal surgery.
METHODS: Data sources, including PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, were searched to identify potentially relevant randomized controlled trials. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. The primary factors included patients' discomfort, operating time and early postoperative complications. Visual acuity and surgically induced astigmatism were chosen as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 471 participants with 479 eyes in eight trials between 2005 and 2011 were analyzed. Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy was associated with significantly fewer patients suffering from postoperative discomfort at 1 day (odds ratio [OR] 0.07; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.01 to 0.49; p = 0.007) and 7 days (OR 0.14; 95 % CI 0.03 to 0.73; p = 0.02) follow-up, and was more effective in reducing surgically induced astigmatism (mean difference -0.23D; 95 % CI -0.31 to -0.15; p < 0.00001) compared to 20-gauge vitrectomy. The sutureless group achieved shorter wound opening (mean difference -1.97 minutes; 95 % CI -2.69 to -1.25; p < 0.00001) as well as wound closure time (mean difference -4.55 minutes; 95 % CI -5.43 to -3.66; p < 0.00001), but the overall surgery time was comparable (mean difference -0.14 minutes; 95 % CI -3.52 to 3.24; p = 0.93). There were no significant differences in the complication rates between the two groups with the exception of postoperative hypotony, which was more likely with the sutureless group (OR 3.73; 95 % CI 1.43 to 9.76; p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: According to the present data, transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy offered significantly less postoperative discomfort and decreased surgically induced astigmatism without increasing the risk of vision-threatening complications. Further trials with contemporary equipment and larger sample size are suggested to confirm this conclusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22695935     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-012-2077-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  34 in total

1.  Incidence of endophthalmitis after 20-gauge vs 23-gauge vs 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy.

Authors:  Ingrid U Scott; Harry W Flynn; Nur Acar; Sundeep Dev; Saad Shaikh; Robert A Mittra; J Fernando Arevalo; Andres Kychenthal; Allen Kunselman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Multicenter survey with a systematic overview of acute-onset endophthalmitis after transconjunctival microincision vitrectomy surgery.

Authors:  Yusuke Oshima; Kazuaki Kadonosono; Hidetaka Yamaji; Makoto Inoue; Munenori Yoshida; Hideya Kimura; Masahito Ohji; Fumio Shiraga; Toshimitsu Hamasaki
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy.

Authors:  Claus Eckardt
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2005 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Comparison of visual function after epiretinal membrane removal by 20-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy.

Authors:  Kazuaki Kadonosono; Tadashi Yamakawa; Eiichi Uchio; Yasuo Yanagi; Yasuhiro Tamaki; Makoto Araie
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Performance analysis of new-generation vitreous cutters.

Authors:  Sophia Y Fang; Charles M T DeBoer; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Comparison of clinical outcomes and wound dynamics of sclerotomy ports of 20, 25, and 23 gauge vitrectomy.

Authors:  Manish Nagpal; Sharang Wartikar; Kamal Nagpal
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Transconjunctival sutureless 25-gauge versus 20-gauge standard vitrectomy: correlation between corneal topography and ultrasound biomicroscopy measurements of sclerotomy sites.

Authors:  Teresio Avitabile; Francesco Castiglione; Vincenza Bonfiglio; Filippo Castiglione
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  25-, 23-, and 20-gauge vitrectomy in epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative study of 553 cases.

Authors:  Otman Sandali; Mohamed El Sanharawi; Nicolas Lecuen; Pierre-Olivier Barale; Sebastien Bonnel; Elena Basli; Vincent Borderie; Laurent Laroche; Claire Monin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  23-gauge sutureless vitrectomy and 20-gauge vitrectomy: a case series comparison.

Authors:  A Misra; G Ho-Yen; R L Burton
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Evaluation of wound closure in oblique 23-gauge sutureless sclerotomies with visante optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Mehran Taban; Sumit Sharma; Alexandre A C M Ventura; Peter K Kaiser
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  4 in total

1.  Iatrogenic retinal breaks and postoperative retinal detachments in microincision vitrectomy surgery compared with conventional 20-gauge vitrectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  G H Chen; R Tzekov; F Z Jiang; S H Mao; Y H Tong; W S Li
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  [A 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy after induction of general anesthesia: effect of additional retrobulbar anesthesia on postoperative pain].

Authors:  K Bayerl; K A Boost; A Wolf; A Kampik; M Schaumberger; C Haritoglou
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Outcomes of microincision vitrectomy surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Shimpei Sato; Maiko Inoue; Shin Yamane; Akira Arakawa; Mikiro Mori; Kazuaki Kadonosono
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-04

4.  Idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: safety, efficacy and patient related outcomes.

Authors:  Lorenzo Iuliano; Giovanni Fogliato; Francesca Gorgoni; Eleonora Corbelli; Francesco Bandello; Marco Codenotti
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.