Literature DB >> 16039005

Intergenomic conflict revealed by patterns of sex-biased gene expression.

Tim Connallon1, L Lacey Knowles.   

Abstract

Intergenomic conflict can affect the distribution of genes across eukaryotic genomes. Because the phenotypic optima of males and females often differ, the fitness consequences of newly arisen alleles might not be concordant between the sexes and can be sexually antagonistic--genetic variants favored in one sex are deleterious in the other. In this article, we demonstrate that previously unexplained patterns of sex-biased gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster might have evolved by sexual antagonism, and that the majority of sex-biased expression is due to adaptive changes in males, implying that males experience stronger selection than females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16039005     DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2005.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  71 in total

1.  Resolving intralocus sexual conflict: genetic mechanisms and time frame.

Authors:  Andrew D Stewart; Alison Pischedda; William R Rice
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The chicken Z chromosome is enriched for genes with preferential expression in ovarian somatic cells.

Authors:  Libor Mořkovský; Radka Storchová; Jiří Plachý; Robert Ivánek; Petr Divina; Jiří Hejnar
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Effects of X-linkage and sex-biased gene expression on the rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  John F Baines; Stanley A Sawyer; Daniel L Hartl; John Parsch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  The resolution of sexual antagonism by gene duplication.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Sex-biased gene expression and sexual conflict throughout development.

Authors:  Fiona C Ingleby; Ilona Flis; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  Repeated evolution of testis-specific new genes: the case of telomere-capping genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Raphaëlle Dubruille; Gabriel A B Marais; Benjamin Loppin
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-07-11

Review 8.  Are homologies in vertebrate sex determination due to shared ancestry or to limited options?

Authors:  Jennifer A Marshall Graves; Catherine L Peichel
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Paolo Innocenti; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  A microarray analysis of sex- and gonad-biased gene expression in the zebrafish: evidence for masculinization of the transcriptome.

Authors:  Clayton M Small; Ginger E Carney; Qianxing Mo; Marina Vannucci; Adam G Jones
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.