Literature DB >> 16037147

The influence of gender on loss of consciousness with sevoflurane or propofol.

Mitsuharu Kodaka1, Jay W Johansen, Peter S Sebel.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Studies have suggested that hypnotic requirements for general anesthesia and emergence may be influenced by gender. In this study, we examined the effect of gender on the hypnotic requirement for loss of consciousness (LOC) using either a volatile (sevoflurane) or an IV (propofol) anesthetic. One-hundred-fifteen unpremedicated, ASA physical status I-II patients, aged 18-40 yr old, received either sevoflurane by mask to a predetermined end-tidal concentration (%ET(sevo)) or propofol by target-controlled infusion (effect site) while breathing spontaneously. After sufficient time for equilibration, LOC was assessed by lack of response to mild prodding. The up-down method of Dixon was used to determine the hypnotic target concentration at 50% response (LOC(50)). No statistically significant difference in LOC(50) was noted between men and women for sevoflurane (0.83% +/- 0.1% and 0.92% +/- 0.09% ET, respectively). Men required significantly more propofol than women (2.9 +/- 0.2 versus 2.7 +/- 0.1 microg/mL, respectively). However, there was no difference in the bispectral index (BIS) at LOC for men or women with either hypnotic anesthetic. This investigation identified a small, statistically significant difference in hypnotic requirement at LOC(50) between men and women with propofol but not with sevoflurane. As defined by BIS, men and women had equivalent hypnotic states at LOC(50), indicating that gender had no clinically significant effect on hypnotic requirements. However, BIS at a defined clinical end-point (LOC(50)) was significantly different between the sevoflurane and propofol groups, suggesting that neurophysiological effects of these anesthetics may be different. IMPLICATIONS: Gender affects the dosing requirements for, and response to, many drugs used in anesthetic practice. Loss of consciousness is an early clinical marker of hypnotic drug effect. We found no significant difference to either an inhaled (sevoflurane) or IV (propofol) anesthetic related to patient gender.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16037147     DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000154534.71371.4F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of two different sevoflurane expelling methods on emergence agitation in infants following sevoflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  Yunliang Yang; Tieying Song; Hong Wang; Kunfeng Gu; Pengyu Ma; Xiaojing Ma; Jianhui Zhao; Yuxia Li; JianHui Zhao; Guangyao Yang; Ruyu Yan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

2.  Sevoflurane/propofol coadministration provides better recovery than sevoflurane in combined general/epidural anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Chao Liang; Ming Ding; Fang Du; Jing Cang; Zhanggang Xue
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  The effects of sevoflurane with propofol and remifentanil on tracheal intubation conditions without neuromuscular blocking agents.

Authors:  Wook Jong Kim; Seong Soo Choi; Doo Hwan Kim; Hye Jeong Seo; Eun Ha Suk; Seung Woo Ku; Pyung Hwan Park
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-08-20

Review 4.  Monitoring the depth of anaesthesia.

Authors:  Bojan Musizza; Samo Ribaric
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Estrogen Receptor-A in Medial Preoptic Area Contributes to Sex Difference of Mice in Response to Sevoflurane Anesthesia.

Authors:  Yunyun Zhang; Huiming Li; Xinxin Zhang; Sa Wang; Dan Wang; Jiajia Wang; Tingting Tong; Zhen Zhang; Qianzi Yang; Hailong Dong
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.271

Review 6.  Technological advances in perioperative monitoring: Current concepts and clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Geetanjali Chilkoti; Rachna Wadhwa; Ashok Kumar Saxena
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

7.  The Influence of Differences in Solvents and Concentration on the Efficacy of Propofol at Induction of Anesthesia.

Authors:  Yukako Obata; Yushi U Adachi; Katsumi Suzuki; Taiga Itagaki; Hiromi Kato; Maiko Satomoto; Yoshiki Nakajima
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2016-01-21

8.  Clinical vs. bispectral index-guided propofol induction of anesthesia: A comparative study.

Authors:  Snehdeep Arya; Veena Asthana; Jagdish P Sharma
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2013-01

9.  Male patients require higher optimal effect-site concentrations of propofol during i-gel insertion with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg.

Authors:  Jung Ju Choi; Ji Young Kim; Dongchul Lee; Young Jin Chang; Noo Ree Cho; Hyun Jeong Kwak
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Protective effect of sevoflurane on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat hearts and its impact on HIF-1α and caspase-3 expression.

Authors:  Tao Zhou; Shanliang Guo; Shaolin Wang; Qiong Li; Mingsheng Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.