PURPOSE: We conducted a cross-sectional study examining potentially modifiable factors associated with cognitive impairments (mild or severe) in older whites, African Americans and Hispanics attending an outpatient eye clinic. METHODS: In-clinic interviews and physical examinations assessed social, demographic and health information from 100 consecutive Hispanic, African-American and white adults aged > or = 55. Our primary outcome was presence of any cognitive impairment (mild or severe) using the St. Louis University Mental Status Examination (SLUMS) scale. RESULTS: Of the 100 subjects, 65 screened positive for cognitive impairments on the SLUMS cognitive instrument: 46 with mild cognitive impairment and 19 with severe impairment (possible dementia). African-American and Hispanic adults (nonwhites) were significantly more likely to have cognitive impairment compared to white adults (OR 2.80: 95% CI = 1.05-7.44), independent of age, years of education and systolic blood pressure. Subjects with diabetes also had increased odds of cognitive impairments (OR 3.28, 95% CI = 1.21-8.90) even after adjusting for relevant confounders. There was a nonsignificant trend between visual acuity impairment and cognitive impairment (p = 0.059). CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-five percent of adults aged > or = 55 attending the eye clinic screened positive for cognitive impairments, with higher rates among nonwhites and adults living with diabetes.
PURPOSE: We conducted a cross-sectional study examining potentially modifiable factors associated with cognitive impairments (mild or severe) in older whites, African Americans and Hispanics attending an outpatient eye clinic. METHODS: In-clinic interviews and physical examinations assessed social, demographic and health information from 100 consecutive Hispanic, African-American and white adults aged > or = 55. Our primary outcome was presence of any cognitive impairment (mild or severe) using the St. Louis University Mental Status Examination (SLUMS) scale. RESULTS: Of the 100 subjects, 65 screened positive for cognitive impairments on the SLUMS cognitive instrument: 46 with mild cognitive impairment and 19 with severe impairment (possible dementia). African-American and Hispanic adults (nonwhites) were significantly more likely to have cognitive impairment compared to white adults (OR 2.80: 95% CI = 1.05-7.44), independent of age, years of education and systolic blood pressure. Subjects with diabetes also had increased odds of cognitive impairments (OR 3.28, 95% CI = 1.21-8.90) even after adjusting for relevant confounders. There was a nonsignificant trend between visual acuity impairment and cognitive impairment (p = 0.059). CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-five percent of adults aged > or = 55 attending the eye clinic screened positive for cognitive impairments, with higher rates among nonwhites and adults living with diabetes.
Authors: R D Lindeman; L J Romero; A LaRue; C L Yau; D S Schade; K M Koehler; R N Baumgartner; P J Garry Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: S Kalmijn; D Foley; L White; C M Burchfiel; J D Curb; H Petrovitch; G W Ross; R J Havlik; L J Launer Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Jim Grigsby; Kaye Kaye; Susan M Shetterly; Judith Baxter; Nora E Morgenstern; Richard F Hamman Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2002 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Jasenka Demirovic; Ronald Prineas; David Loewenstein; Judy Bean; Ranjan Duara; Steven Sevush; Jose Szapocznik Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 3.797