B L Harlow1, D W Cramer, D A Bell, W R Welch. 1. Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether the use of talc in genital hygiene increases the risk for epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: We interviewed 235 white women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer between 1984-1987 at ten Boston metropolitan area hospitals and 239 population-based controls of similar race, age, and residence. RESULTS: Overall, 49% of cases and 39% of controls reported exposure to talc, via direct application to the perineum or to undergarments, sanitary napkins, or diaphragms, which yielded a 1.5 odds ratio (OR) for ovarian cancer (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-2.1). Among women with perineal exposure to talc, the risk was significantly elevated in the subgroups of women who applied it: 1) directly as a body powder (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.7), 2) on a daily basis (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.0), and 3) for more than 10 years (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.7). The greatest ovarian cancer risk associated with perineal talc use was observed in the subgroup of women estimated to have made more than 10,000 applications during years when they were ovulating and had an intact genital tract (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.4); however, this exposure was found in only 14% of the women with ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the concept that a life-time pattern of perineal talc use may increase the risk for epithelial ovarian cancer but is unlikely to be the etiology for the majority of epithelial ovarian cancers.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether the use of talc in genital hygiene increases the risk for epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: We interviewed 235 white women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer between 1984-1987 at ten Boston metropolitan area hospitals and 239 population-based controls of similar race, age, and residence. RESULTS: Overall, 49% of cases and 39% of controls reported exposure to talc, via direct application to the perineum or to undergarments, sanitary napkins, or diaphragms, which yielded a 1.5 odds ratio (OR) for ovarian cancer (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-2.1). Among women with perineal exposure to talc, the risk was significantly elevated in the subgroups of women who applied it: 1) directly as a body powder (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.7), 2) on a daily basis (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.0), and 3) for more than 10 years (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.7). The greatest ovarian cancer risk associated with perineal talc use was observed in the subgroup of women estimated to have made more than 10,000 applications during years when they were ovulating and had an intact genital tract (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.4); however, this exposure was found in only 14% of the women with ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the concept that a life-time pattern of perineal talc use may increase the risk for epithelial ovarian cancer but is unlikely to be the etiology for the majority of epithelial ovarian cancers.
Authors: Karin A Rosenblatt; Noel S Weiss; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Kristine G Wicklund; Mary Anne Rossing Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2011-03-10 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Kevin M Elias; S Intidhar Labidi-Galy; Allison F Vitonis; Jason L Hornick; Leona A Doyle; Michelle S Hirsch; Daniel W Cramer; Ronny Drapkin Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2013-12-14 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Elisabeth A Erekson; Deanna K Martin; E Christine Brousseau; Sallis O Yip; Terri R Fried Journal: Menopause Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Nicole L Gonzalez; Katie M O'Brien; Aimee A D'Aloisio; Dale P Sandler; Clarice R Weinberg Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Michelle L Kurta; Kirsten B Moysich; Joel L Weissfeld; Ada O Youk; Clareann H Bunker; Robert P Edwards; Francesmary Modugno; Roberta B Ness; Brenda Diergaarde Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Iwona M Gabriel; Allison F Vitonis; William R Welch; Linda Titus; Daniel W Cramer Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Stalo Karageorgi; Margaret A Gates; Susan E Hankinson; Immaculata De Vivo Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-04-20 Impact factor: 4.254