Literature DB >> 16034758

Is early laparoscopic appendectomy feasible in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass? A prospective study.

Brian K P Goh1, Chan-Hon Chui, Te-Lu Yap, Yee Low, Thichen K Lama, Ghassan Alkouder, Sai Prasad, Anette S Jacobsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of an appendiceal mass remains controversial with 2 schools of thought; early surgical intervention vs nonoperative management with or without interval appendectomy. The aim is to determine the role and safety of early laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass.
METHODS: This is a prospective study of 88 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent attempted LA for suspected acute appendicitis at KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, between May and October 2003.
RESULTS: A total of 88 patients with a mean age of 10 +/- 3 years (range, 3-16 years) underwent LA for an appendiceal mass (n = 22), simple appendicitis (n = 36), other complicated (gangrenous or perforated) appendicitis (n = 23), and a normal appendix (n = 7). There were 7 conversions to open appendicectomy, 3 of which occurred in patients with an appendiceal mass. There were no perioperative or postoperative mortalities. Morbidity occurred in only one patient who underwent LA for perforated appendicitis. He had prolonged sepsis that resolved after 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics. None of the patients with an appendiceal mass developed complications. Patients who underwent early LA for an appendiceal mass had a statistically significant (P < .05) longer operating time (median, 103 minutes; interquartile range, 90-151 minutes, vs median, 87 minutes; interquartile range, 71-112 minutes), prolonged time to ambulation (median, 2.0 days; interquartile range, 2-2.5 days, vs median, 1.0 days; interquartile, 1-2 days), increased time to resumption of diet (median, 4 days; interquartile, 3-5 days, vs median, 2 days; interquartile, 2-3 days), and longer postoperative stay (median, 6.0 days; interquartile, 5.5-6.5 days, vs median, 4.0 days; interquartile, 3-5.5 days) compared with patients presenting with appendicitis without mass formation. However, there was no statistical difference in these parameters when LA for an appendiceal mass was compared with LA for other complicated appendicitis (perforated and gangrenous).
CONCLUSION: Although early LA for an appendiceal mass is a technically demanding procedure, it can be performed safely in children with minimal morbidity and mortality. In an era where patients' demand for "key-hole" surgery is rising, early LA is a safe and viable option in the management of children with an appendiceal mass. It also offers the advantage of avoiding misdiagnoses and the need for a second hospitalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16034758     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.03.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  19 in total

Review 1.  Management of appendiceal mass: controversial issues revisited.

Authors:  Abdul-Wahed N Meshikhes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscess in children with perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Michael F McNeeley; Nghia Jack Vo; Somnath J Prabhu; Jason Vergnani; Dennis W Shaw
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-01-14

3.  Effectiveness of Interval Appendectomy After Conservative Treatment of Pediatric Ruptured Appendicitis with Abscess.

Authors:  Takeshi Furuya; Mikiya Inoue; Kiminobu Sugito; Shumpei Goto; Hiroyuki Kawashima; Hide Kaneda; Takayuki Masuko; Kensuke Ohashi; Taro Ikeda; Tsugumichi Koshinaga
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Factors associated with and outcomes of open conversion after laparoscopic minor hepatectomy: initial experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Brian K P Goh; Chung-Yip Chan; Jen-San Wong; Ser-Yee Lee; Victor T W Lee; Peng-Chung Cheow; Pierce K H Chow; London L P J Ooi; Alexander Y F Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  First experience with robotic spleen-saving, vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy in Singapore: a report of three consecutive cases.

Authors:  Brian Kp Goh; Jen-San Wong; Chung-Yip Chan; Peng-Chung Cheow; London Lpj Ooi; Alexander Yf Chung
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Laparoscopic appendectomy after conservative management of appendix mass.

Authors:  J Gillick; N Mohanan; L Das; P Puri
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Evolution of laparoscopic liver resection at Singapore General Hospital: a nine-year experience of 195 consecutive resections.

Authors:  Brian Kp Goh; Jin-Yao Teo; Chung-Yip Chan; Ser-Yee Lee; Peng-Chung Cheow; Pierce Kh Chow; London Lpj Ooi; Alexander Yf Chung
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  Early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery in Singapore: single-institution experience with 20 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Brian Kp Goh; Ser-Yee Lee; Chung-Yip Chan; Jen-San Wong; Peng-Chung Cheow; Alexander Yf Chung; London Lpj Ooi
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 1.858

9.  Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: A prospective study.

Authors:  L R Padankatti; R Kirthy Pramod; A Gupta; P Ramachandran
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-07

10.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy is a favorable alternative for complicated appendicitis in children.

Authors:  J Deepak; Prakash Agarwal; R K Bagdi; S Balagopal; R Madhu; P Balamourougane; Zaffer Saleem Khanday
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.