Literature DB >> 16033349

Visual outcomes following vitrectomy and peeling of epiretinal membrane.

James G Wong1, Nitin Sachdev, Paul E Beaumont, Andrew A Chang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Visual outcomes of patients following vitrectomy and peeling of visually significant epiretinal membranes were assessed to determine the influence of specific perioperative factors and surgical complications on final visual acuity and functional vision.
METHODS: In an unmatched, consecutive surgical series, vitrectomy and membrane peeling were performed on 125 eyes of 123 patients with visually significant macular epiretinal membranes. Patients were followed for 6-36 months. Visual outcome measures included postoperative logMAR visual acuity, change in visual acuity and functional vision tasks evaluated by questionnaire. Perioperative factors including duration of symptoms, preoperative visual acuity, aetiology, membrane type and leakage on fundal fluorescein angiogram were correlated with final visual outcomes.
RESULTS: Visual acuity improved by a mean of 0.31 A+/- 0.21 units (three lines of vision). In 104 cases (83%), visual acuity improved in patients by two lines or more, with 20 cases (16%) having unchanged acuity and one case (1%) having worse acuity. Ninety-three per cent of interviewed cases reported improvement in functional vision, especially reduction of distortion. Cataract was observed in 52 cases (52% of phakic eyes) postoperatively compared with 19 cases (19%) preoperatively. Postoperative visual acuity correlated with preoperative visual acuity. Patients with worse preoperative vision recorded greater visual improvement following surgery. No other perioperative factors were found to have a prognostic value in this study.
CONCLUSION: Epiretinal membrane peeling improves vision in the majority of patients with significant symptoms, even if preoperative visual acuity is not substantially reduced. Surgery improves functional vision including metamorphopsia not measurable by visual acuity, and thus assessment of functional vision should be included in surgical case planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16033349     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2005.01025.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  33 in total

1.  [High-resolution optical coherence tomography to evaluate vitreomacular traction before and after membrane peeling].

Authors:  M Georgopoulos; W Geitzenauer; C Ahlers; C Simader; C Scholda; U Schmidt-Erfurth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Potential role of Müller cells in the pathogenesis of macropsia associated with epiretinal membrane: a hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  Ahmet Colakoglu; Solmaz Balci Akar
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Improvement of horizontal macular contraction after surgical removal of epiretinal membranes.

Authors:  H K Yang; S J Kim; Y S Jung; K G Kim; J H Kim; H G Yu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Early postoperative changes of the foveal surface in epiretinal membranes: comparison of 23-gauge macular surgery with air vs. balanced salt solution.

Authors:  Martin A Leitritz; Focke Ziemssen; Bogomil Voykov; Spyridon Dimopoulos; Ditta Zobor; Karl U Bartz-Schmidt; Faik Gelisken
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Scanning laser 'en face' retinal imaging of epiretinal membranes.

Authors:  Lukas Reznicek; Simeon Dabov; Bader Kayat; Raffael Liegl; Anselm Kampik; Michael Ulbig; Marcus Kernt
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-24

6.  The role of membrane-inner retina adherence in predicting simultaneous internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery.

Authors:  P Tranos; L Wickham; N Dervenis; A Vakalis; S Asteriades; P Stavrakas
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Preoperative aniseikonia is a prognostic factor for postoperative stereopsis in patients with unilateral epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  Fumiki Okamoto; Shohei Morikawa; Yoshimi Sugiura; Sujin Hoshi; Takahiro Hiraoka; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Visual acuity outcomes following surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane: an analysis of data from 2001 to 2011.

Authors:  S R Dawson; M Shunmugam; T H Williamson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Associations between preoperative OCT parameters and visual outcome 3 months postoperatively in patients undergoing vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  Mariana P Sheales; Zabrina S Kingston; Rohan W Essex
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Inner retinal thinning after Brilliant Blue G-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling for vitreoretinal interface disorders.

Authors:  Vikas Ambiya; Abhilash Goud; Mitali Khodani; Jay Chhablani
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.