Literature DB >> 16028736

Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 8: lumbar fusion for disc herniation and radiculopathy.

Daniel K Resnick1, Tanvir F Choudhri, Andrew T Dailey, Michael W Groff, Larry Khoo, Paul G Matz, Praveen Mummaneni, William C Watters, Jeffrey Wang, Beverly C Walters, Mark N Hadley.   

Abstract

There is no convincing medical evidence to support the routine use of lumbar fusion at the time of a primary lumbar disc excision. There is conflicting Class III medical evidence regarding the potential benefit of the addition of fusion in this circumstance. Therefore, the definite increase in cost and complications associated with the use of fusion are not justified. Patients with preoperative lumbar instability may benefit from fusion at the time of lumbar discectomy; however, the incidence of such instability appears to be very low (< 5%) in the general lumbar disc herniation population. Patients who suffer from chronic low-back pain, or are heavy laborers or athletes with axial low-back pain, in addition to radicular symptoms may also be candidates for fusion at the time of lumbar disc excision. Patients with a recurrent disc herniation have been treated successfully with both reoperative discectomy and reoperative discectomy combined with fusion. In patients with a recurrent lumbar disc herniation with associated spinal deformity, instability, or associated chronic low-back pain, consideration of fusion in addition to reoperative discectomy is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16028736     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.6.0673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  12 in total

Review 1.  Multilevel mini-open TLIFs and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: description of a simple technical nuance used to increase intraoperative safety and improve workflow. Tips and tricks and review of the literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Francesco Certo; Massimiliano Visocchi; Giovanni Sciacca; Mario Piccini; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  [Interbody fusion procedures. Development from a historical perspective].

Authors:  Marcus Rickert; Michael Rauschmann; C Fleege; E Behrbalk; J Harms
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; Kevin Phan; Greg Malham; Kevin Seex; Prashanth J Rao
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12

4.  Quality-of-life outcomes with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based on long-term analysis of 304 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Mick J Perez-Cruet; Namath S Hussain; G Zachary White; Evan M Begun; Robert A Collins; Daniel K Fahim; Girish K Hiremath; Fadumo M Adbi; Sammy A Yacob
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Second opinion for degenerative spinal conditions: an option or a necessity? A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Mario Lenza; Rachelle Buchbinder; Margaret P Staples; Oscar F P Dos Santos; Reynaldo A Brandt; Claudio L Lottenberg; Miguel Cendoroglo; Mario Ferretti
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Provides Sustained Improvements in Clinical and Radiological Outcomes up to 5 Years Postoperatively in Patients with Neurogenic Symptoms Secondary to Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; Priyesh Dhoke; Kae-Sian Tay; William Yeo; Wai-Mun Yue
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-04-12

7.  Optimal medial transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion approach with five extensive options: A simulated study on three-dimensional digital reconstructed images.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Xun-Lin Li; Hai-Jun Tian; Kai Zhang; Chang-Qing Zhao; Sun-Ren Sheng; Yan Lin; Wen-Fei Ni; Xiang-Yang Wang; Jie Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Zhenhua Feng; Xiaobin Li; Qian Tang; Chenggui Wang; Wenhao Zheng; Hui Zhang; Ai-Min Wu; Naifeng Tian; Yaosen Wu; Wenfei Ni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches.

Authors:  Chad D Cole; Todd D McCall; Meic H Schmidt; Andrew T Dailey
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2009-04-29

10.  Effectiveness of dynamic fixation Coflex treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jun-Xi Zhang; Xi-Wei Jing; Ping Cui; Xin He; Ding-Jun Hao; Shu-Jing Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.