Literature DB >> 16028573

The capacity of visual short-term memory is not a fixed number of objects.

Greg Davis1, Amanda Holmes.   

Abstract

Luck and Vogel (1997) have reported several striking results in support of the view that visual short-term memory (VSTM) has a fixed capacity of four objects, irrespective of how many relevant features those objects comprise. However, more recent studies have challenged this account, indicating only a weak effect of the number of objects once other factors are more evenly equated across conditions. Here, we employed a symmetry manipulation to verify object segmentation in our displays, to demonstrate that when spatial and masking factors are held constant, the number of objects per se has no effect on VSTM. Instead, VSTM capacity may reflect the number of object "parts" or feature conjunctions in a given display.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16028573     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

1.  What are the units of visual short-term memory, objects or spatial locations?

Authors:  D Lee; M M Chun
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-02

2.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Can attention select only a fixed number of objects at a time?

Authors:  G Davis; V L Welch; A Holmes; A Shepherd
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  Limitations of object-based feature encoding in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Is visual short-term memory object based? Rejection of the "strong-object" hypothesis.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-10

7.  Perceptual completion and object-based representations in short-term visual memory.

Authors:  Peter Walker; Simon J Davies
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

8.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

9.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.

Authors:  S J Luck; E K Vogel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Parts of recognition.

Authors:  D D Hoffman; W A Richards
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1984-12
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain.

Authors:  B R Postle
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  What are the units of storage in visual working memory?

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; Christopher L Asplund; René Marois
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Representation of different exact numbers of prey by a spider-eating predator.

Authors:  Fiona R Cross; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 4.  A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Dimension-based attention in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Michael Pilling; Doug J K Barrett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07

6.  An integrative view of storage of low- and high-level visual dimensions in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Hagit Magen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-22

Review 7.  Exploring visual-spatial working memory: a critical review of concepts and models.

Authors:  J McAfoose; B T Baune
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 7.444

8.  Working memory inefficiency: minimal information is utilized in visual recognition tasks.

Authors:  Zhijian Chen; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Attribute pair-based visual recognition and memory.

Authors:  Masahiko Morita; Shigemitsu Morokami; Hiromi Morita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Gestalt Theory Approach to Structure in Language.

Authors:  Hans Buffart; Haike Jacobs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.