Literature DB >> 16027986

The safety and usefulness of endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis early after esophagectomy and reconstruction.

M S Maish1, S R DeMeester, E Choustoulakis, J W Briel, J A Hagen, J H Peters, J C Lipham, C G Bremner, T R DeMeester.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although rare, graft ischemia and necrosis after esophagectomy is a devastating complication. The aim of this study was to review our experience with early endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis after esophagectomy and reconstruction.
METHODS: From a population of 479 patients who underwent esophagectomy during the years 1996-2003, we identified 102 patients who had endoscopy within 21 days of operation.
RESULTS: Endoscopy was performed a median of 9 days after operation. Graft ischemia, anastomotic leak, or both were found in 63 of the 102 patients. Reoperation was necessary in 27% of these patients, including graft removal in nine patients. In 39 patients, endoscopy demonstrated a healthy graft; only one of these patients (2.6%) required reoperation. No patient with ischemia judged insufficient to warrant graft removal on initial endoscopy subsequently lost their graft. There were no complications or anastomotic injuries associated with early endoscopy.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopy early after esophagectomy is safe and provides accurate and reliable identification of graft ischemia that can be used to guide the treatment of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16027986     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8816-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

Review 1.  Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review.

Authors:  J D Urschel
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Intraoperative scanning laser Doppler flowmetry in the assessment of gastric tube perfusion during esophageal resection.

Authors:  N H Boyle; A Pearce; D Hunter; W J Owen; R C Mason
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Colonic interposition after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Peter A Davis; Simon Law; John Wong
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-03

4.  Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition.

Authors:  John W Briel; Anand P Tamhankar; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester; Jan Johansson; Emmanouel Choustoulakis; Jeffrey H Peters; Cedric G Bremner; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.113

  4 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  [Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following esophageal and cardial resection : Definition and validation of a new severity grading classification].

Authors:  A Schaible; T Schmidt; M Diener; U Hinz; P Sauer; D Wichmann; A Königsrainer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Assessment of the blood supply using the indocyanine green fluorescence method and postoperative endoscopic evaluation of anastomosis of the gastric tube during esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Tsutomu Namikawa; Jun Iwabu; Kazune Fujisawa; Sunao Uemura; Sachi Tsuda; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Significant decrease of mortality due to anastomotic leaks following esophageal resection: management makes the difference.

Authors:  Anja Schaible; Thorsten Brenner; Ulf Hinz; Thomas Schmidt; Markus Weigand; Peter Sauer; Markus W Büchler; Alexis Ulrich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Endoscopic assessment 1 day after esophagectomy for predicting cervical esophagogastric anastomosis-relating complications.

Authors:  Hisashi Fujiwara; Yasuaki Nakajima; Kenro Kawada; Yutaka Tokairin; Yutaka Miyawaki; Takuya Okada; Kagami Nagai; Tatsuyuki Kawano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Detection of gastric conduit ischemia or anastomotic breakdown after cervical esophagogastrostomy: the use of computed tomography scan versus early endoscopy.

Authors:  Arzu Oezcelik; Farzaneh Banki; Shahin Ayazi; Emmanuele Abate; Joerg Zehetner; Helen J Sohn; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester; John C Lipham; Suzanne L Palmer; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Role of endoscopy to predict a leak after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Anja Schaible; Alexis Ulrich; Ulf Hinz; Markus W Büchler; Peter Sauer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Radiologic versus endoscopic evaluation of the conduit after esophageal resection: a prospective, blinded, intraindividually controlled diagnostic study.

Authors:  Anja Schaible; Peter Sauer; Werner Hartwig; Thilo Hackert; Ulf Hinz; Boris Radeleff; Markus W Büchler; Jens Werner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Choice of therapeutic strategies in intrathoracic anastomotic leak following esophagectomy.

Authors:  Juntang Guo; Xiangyang Chu; Yang Liu; Naikang Zhou; Yongfu Ma; Chaoyang Liang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Intraoperative Assessment of Perfusion of the Gastric Graft and Correlation With Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Jörg Zehetner; Steven R DeMeester; Evan T Alicuben; Daniel S Oh; John C Lipham; Jeffrey A Hagen; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  An Approach to Accelerate Healing and Shorten the Hospital Stay of Patients With Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy: An Explorative Study of Systematic Endoscopic Intervention.

Authors:  LeQi Zhong; JiuDi Zhong; ZiHui Tan; YiTong Wei; XiaoDong Su; ZheSheng Wen; TieHua Rong; Yi Hu; KongJia Luo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.