Literature DB >> 16025604

Don't blame the 'bio'--blame the 'ethics': varieties of (bio)ethics and the challenge of pluralism.

Max Charlesworth1.   

Abstract

We tend to think that the difficulties in bioethics spring from the novel and alarming issues that arise due to discoveries in the new biosciences and biotechnologies. But many of the crucial difficulties in bioethics arise from the assumption we make about ethics. This paper offers a brief overview of bioethics, and relates ethical 'principlism' to 'ethical fundamentalism.' It then reviews some alternative approaches that have emerged during the second phase of bioethics and argues for a neo-Aristotelian approach. Misconceptions about ethical principles and ethical reasoning not only distort our views of the business of bioethics, but they also prevent us from facing up to the formidable problems posed by ethical pluralism in so-called liberal societies.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Bioethics and Professional Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16025604     DOI: 10.1007/bf02448810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  3 in total

1.  American moralism and the origin of bioethics in the United States.

Authors:  A R Jonsen
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1991-02

2.  Can the moral commons survive autonomy?

Authors: 
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

3.  The tyranny of principles.

Authors:  S Toulmin
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.683

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  How "moral" are the principles of biomedical ethics?--a cross-domain evaluation of the common morality hypothesis.

Authors:  Markus Christen; Christian Ineichen; Carmen Tanner
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.652

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.