Literature DB >> 1602485

Energetics of the strand separation transition in superhelical DNA.

C J Benham1.   

Abstract

In this paper the values of three free energy parameters governing the superhelical strand separation transition are determined by analysis of available experimental data. These are the free energy, a, needed to initiate a run of separation, the torsional stiffness, C, associated with interstrand winding of the two single strands comprising a separated site and the coefficient, K, of the quadratic free energy associated to residual linking. The experimental data used in this analysis are the locations and relative amounts of strand separation occurring in the pBR322 DNA molecule and the measured residual linking, both evaluated over a range of negative linking differences. The analytic method used treats strand separation as a heteropolymeric, co-operative, two-state transition to a torsionally deformable alternative conformation, which takes place in a circular DNA molecule constrained by the constancy of its linking number. The values determined for these parameters under the experimental conditions (T = 310 K, pH = 7.0, monovalent cation concentration = 0.01 M) are a = 10.84(+/- 0.2) kcal/mol, C = 2.5(+/- 0.3) x 10(-13) erg/rad2 and K = 2350(+/- 80) RT/N, where N is the molecular length in base-pairs. In order to assess the accuracy of the author's theoretical methods, these free energy parameters are incorporated into the analysis of superhelical strand separation in different molecules and under other conditions than those used in their evaluation. First, the temperature dependence of transition is treated, then superhelical strand separation is analyzed in a series of DNA molecules having systematic sequence modifications, and the results of these theoretical analyses are compared with those from experiments. In all molecules, transition is predicted in the range of linking differences where it is seen experimentally. Moreover, it occurs at the specific sequence locations that the analysis predicts, and with approximately the predicted relative amounts of transition at each location. The known sensitivities of this transition to changes of temperature and to small sequence modifications are predicted in a quantitatively precise manner by the theoretical results. The demonstrated high-level precision of these theoretical methods provides a tool for the screening of DNA sequences for sites susceptible to superhelical strand separation, some of which may have regulatory or other biological significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1602485     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90404-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  30 in total

1.  Loss of FBP function arrests cellular proliferation and extinguishes c-myc expression.

Authors:  L He; J Liu; I Collins; S Sanford; B O'Connell; C J Benham; D Levens
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Monte Carlo simulations of locally melted supercoiled DNAs in 20 mM ionic strength.

Authors:  Christopher A Sucato; David P Rangel; Dan Aspleaf; Bryant S Fujimoto; J Michael Schurr
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Stress-induced DNA duplex destabilization (SIDD) in the E. coli genome: SIDD sites are closely associated with promoters.

Authors:  Huiquan Wang; Michiel Noordewier; Craig J Benham
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  DNA dynamically directs its own transcription initiation.

Authors:  Chu H Choi; George Kalosakas; Kim O Rasmussen; Makoto Hiromura; Alan R Bishop; Anny Usheva
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Torque measurements reveal sequence-specific cooperative transitions in supercoiled DNA.

Authors:  Florian C Oberstrass; Louis E Fernandes; Zev Bryant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Strand separation in negatively supercoiled DNA.

Authors:  Christian Mazza
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Effect of supercoiling on the juxtaposition and relative orientation of DNA sites.

Authors:  A Vologodskii; N R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Behavior of supercoiled DNA.

Authors:  T R Strick; J F Allemand; D Bensimon; V Croquette
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Integration site choice of a feline immunodeficiency virus vector.

Authors:  Yubin Kang; Christopher J Moressi; Todd E Scheetz; Litao Xie; Diane Thi Tran; Thomas L Casavant; Prashanth Ak; Craig J Benham; Beverly L Davidson; Paul B McCray
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Torque spectroscopy of DNA: base-pair stability, boundary effects, backbending, and breathing dynamics.

Authors:  Florian C Oberstrass; Louis E Fernandes; Paul Lebel; Zev Bryant
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 9.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.