Literature DB >> 16024181

Comparison of late toxicity between continuous low-dose-rate and pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients.

Barbara Bachtiary1, Aaron Dewitt, Melania Pintilie, John Jezioranski, Sandi Ahonen, Wilfrid Levin, Lee Manchul, Ivan Yeung, Michael Milosevic, Anthony Fyles.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare survival and severe late radiation toxicity between patients who received continuous low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT) and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) BT for cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of cervical cancer patients who underwent primary radiotherapy with or without concurrent cisplatin was performed. Late Grade 3 or worse toxicities were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. The study endpoints were overall and disease-free survival and the probability of severe late toxicity.
RESULTS: A total of 109 patients (65.7%) received LDR BT and 57 (34.3%) received PDR BT. Seventy patients received concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin. The 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rate was 70% and 57% for the LDR group and 82% and 70% for the PDR group, respectively (p = 0.25 and p = 0.19). The 3-year probability rate for late Grade 3 or worse toxicity was 7.4% for LDR BT patients and 7.6% for PDR BT patients, respectively (p = 0.69) and 6.9% and 7.6%, respectively, for concurrent chemotherapy vs. none (p = 0.69).
CONCLUSION: No difference was found in severe late toxicity, overall survival, or disease-free survival between the LDR and PDR groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16024181     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

Review 1.  A review of the clinical experience in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Brian V Balgobind; Kees Koedooder; Diego Ordoñez Zúñiga; Raquel Dávila Fajardo; Coen R N Rasch; Bradley R Pieters
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  A Polo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  A review of recent developments in image-guided radiation therapy in cervix cancer.

Authors:  Azmat H Sadozye; Nicholas Reed
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  The role of PET/CT in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fernanda G Herrera; John O Prior
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated, conformal, and four-field pelvic radiotherapy boost plans for gynecologic cancer: a retrospective planning study.

Authors:  Philip Chan; Inhwan Yeo; Gregory Perkins; Anthony Fyles; Michael Milosevic
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Biological equivalence between LDR and PDR in cervical cancer: multifactor analysis using the linear-quadratic model.

Authors:  José Guilherme Couto; Isabel Bravo; Rui Pirraco
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2011-09-30

7.  High precision radiotherapy including intensity-modulated radiation therapy and pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a retrospective monoinstitutional study.

Authors:  Andrea Vavassori; Giulia Riva; Ruggero Spoto; Roberta Lazzari; Cristiana Fodor; Samantha Dicuonzo; Claudia Maria Francia; Matteo Augugliaro; Giuseppe Facondo; Raffaella Cambria; Stefania Comi; Federica Cattani; Francesca Botta; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Stefania Rizzo; Nicoletta Colombo; Roberto Orecchia; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-12-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.