Literature DB >> 16022983

On the influence of soft tissue coverage in the determination of bone kinematics using skin markers.

William R Taylor1, Rainald M Ehrig, Georg N Duda, Hanna Schell, Petra Seebeck, Markus O Heller.   

Abstract

Accurate measurement of underlying bone positions is important for the understanding of normal movement and function, as well as for addressing clinical musculoskeletal or post-injury problems. Non-invasive measurement techniques are limited by the analysis technique and movement of peripheral soft tissues that can introduce significant measurement errors in reproducing the kinematics of the underlying bones when using external skin markers. Reflective markers, skeletally mounted to the right hind limb of three Merino-mix sheep were measured simultaneously with markers attached to the skin of each segment, during repetitions of gait trials. The movement of the skin markers relative to the underlying bone positions was then assessed using the Point Cluster Technique (PCT), raw averaging and the Optimal Common Shape Technique (OCST), a new approach presented in this manuscript. Errors in the position of the proximal joint centre, predicted from the corresponding skin markers, were shown to be phasic and strongly associated with the amount soft tissue coverage, averaging 8.5 mm for the femur, 2.8 for the tibia and 2.0 for the metatarsus. Although the results show a better prediction of bone kinematics associated with the Optimal Common Shape Technique, these errors were large for all three assessment techniques and much greater than the differences between the various techniques. Whilst individual markers moved up to 4 mm from the optimal marker set configuration, average peak errors of up to 16, 5 and 3 mm (hip, knee and tibio-metatarsal joints respectively) were observed, suggesting that a large amount of kinematic noise is produced from the synchronous shifting of marker sets, potentially as a result of underlying muscle firing and the inertial effects of heel impact. Current techniques are therefore limited in their ability to determine the kinematics of underlying bones based on skin markers, particularly in segments with more pronounced soft tissue coverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16022983     DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  26 in total

Review 1.  [Musculoskeletal biomechanics of the knee joint. Principles of preoperative planning for osteotomy and joint replacement].

Authors:  M O Heller; G Matziolis; C König; W R Taylor; S Hinterwimmer; H Graichen; H-C Hege; G Bergmann; C Perka; G N Duda
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  The accuracy of the use of functional hip motions on localization of the center of the hip.

Authors:  Andrew D Speirs; Daniel L Benoit; Mélanie L Beaulieu; Mario Lamontagne; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-07

Review 3.  Biomechanical techniques to evaluate tibial rotation. A systematic review.

Authors:  Mak-Ham Lam; Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Modifications of femoral component design in multi-radius total knee arthroplasty lead to higher lateral posterior femoro-tibial translation.

Authors:  Tilman Pfitzner; Philippe Moewis; Patrick Stein; Heide Boeth; Adam Trepczynski; Philipp von Roth; Georg N Duda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Kinematic description of soft tissue artifacts: quantifying rigid versus deformation components and their relation with bone motion.

Authors:  Helios de Rosario; Alvaro Page; Antonio Besa; Vicente Mata; Efraim Conejero
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Accurate Prediction of Knee Angles during Open-Chain Rehabilitation Exercises Using a Wearable Array of Nanocomposite Stretch Sensors.

Authors:  David S Wood; Kurt Jensen; Allison Crane; Hyunwook Lee; Hayden Dennis; Joshua Gladwell; Anne Shurtz; David T Fullwood; Matthew K Seeley; Ulrike H Mitchell; William F Christensen; Anton E Bowden
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Personalised pose estimation from single-plane moving fluoroscope images using deep convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Florian Vogl; Pascal Schütz; Barbara Postolka; Renate List; William Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  An efficient hybrid method for 3D to 2D medical image registration.

Authors:  Shabnam Saadat; Diana Perriman; Jennie M Scarvell; Paul N Smith; Catherine R Galvin; Joseph Lynch; Mark R Pickering
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.421

9.  A low morbidity surgical approach to the sheep femoral trochlea.

Authors:  Patrick Orth; Henning Madry
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Hands-off and hands-on casting consistency of amputee below knee sockets using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Safari; Philip Rowe; Angus McFadyen; Arjan Buis
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.